itsrak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2014
- Messages
- 1,367
- Reaction score
- 5,086
I've never even heard anyone make the case for 'buried in concrete'. In fill under concrete would certainly seem possible. As would crevice in this non-square complex. Duct work, sure. Dead space, sure. Maybe even tunnels. Roof, sure. I was in DC for many years, and recall the case of a drunk male partying at a bar in an old brownstone type building near Ford's Theatre, got up on the roof, and stumbled, slipping into crevice between two buildings. Body hung there, so tightly wedged they probably couldn't even scream for help, for many years. When they found him, his skeletonized remains still had his id on him. Never have been able to find a link for that case. Yeah, the fact remains that there is only one place on the planet that could be searched with a greater than infinitesimally tiny chance of finding the remains of Brian Shaffer - the Gateway Complex. What would be the best interview ever on this case would be interview with construction foreman and members of construction crew and building owner OSU's main guy on the project back in '06. Never happen. The Hurst interviews were certainly interesting, when he speculated that Brian entered the construction zone, and described the construction zone as 'completely dug up'. But a group interview of the construction guys would be fascinating. Like this guy, for one:I appreciate your comments and input on the construction site given your background knowledge; however, this is an example of what I am referring to in my earlier post. I think it is a misstep to assume that “ruling out” the construction area (if we want to call it that) means there are no other plausible theories that end in Brian being “entombed” in the building somewhere. None of the three possibilities you outlined mention this as a possibility.
For example: what about the roof? This actually came up recently on a well-known true crime podcast. One of the hosts asked about the roof, and the only answer anyone could come up with was along the lines of “I have to imagine they searched there.” But could CPD have done a quick cursory search early on, when they felt it was unlikely he was there (understandably so) and just missed him? I think it’s possible.
To be clear, I’m not suggesting that Brian Shaffer’s skeleton is just hanging out in full view on the roof. While the bar was small, the building itself is not. It houses an entire movie theater and other businesses. There are crevices. There is duct work (we have seen missing people later found in duct work—see: Jamie Minor). In fact, if you look at Google Earth, there are some weird angles where the two subunits of the building are conjoined. Could he have gotten wedged somewhere? Drunk people do weird things.
There was a stairwell located near where Brian was last seen on camera. Does it provide access to the roof? Is anyone familiar with the building layout to know how one would get up there? There has to be some way. A door can be seen on the aerial view.
If I were taking over this case, the first thing I would do is extensively search the roof and all crevices/duct work etc. even if it was searched before. I know it’s a long shot, but where else on this planet could you search so easily and have any greater chance of finding him?
I am sure there are other highly unusual places within the building structure that Brian could have ended up in a very strange accident as well. I agree the “buried in concrete” theory seems unlikely—maybe even distracting from all the other places in the building he could have ended up. But my point is: let’s not dismiss other possibilities that end in the bar without getting buried in concrete.
Would love to hear this guy - and the other guys - explain why there is no way in $*%%#^# that Brian Shaffer's remains are in the complex, why the stench wasn't his body decaying, why they are absolutely sure that Brian got out, what compelled Hurst to suggest that the construction area was not well secured ....
Attachments
Last edited: