I believe in the court notes the judge ruled in favor of the prosecution to use other acts. The state withdrew 3 of the other acts for G4 that pertained to BW.
Evidence Pursuant to 404(B)" filed on February 22, 2021. The withdrawn items stated as follows:
3) Instance of Defendant's father threatening Defendant's mother with a gun.
4) Allegations that Defendant's father has killed/plotted/threatened to kill others before.
7) Defendant's father/co-defendant threatening Christopher Rhoden, Sr. with a gun within a week of the homicides.
It seems from reading the court notes that the other acts use was granted by the judge.
These are some of the 5-16-22 notes that pertain to other acts.
The Court therefore finds and concludes that the Defendant's Motion No. 82, requesting that this Court issue an order in limine prohibiting the State of Ohio from introducing other acts evidence at trial, is not well taken, and it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion No. 82 is hereby overruled and denied.