OH Pike County: 8 in Rhoden Family Murdered Over Custody Issue 4 Members Wagner Family Arrested#39

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
RSD. I apologize with all my heart. Since I retired and moved in 4 years I have not yelled more than 5 times. When in the road driving. My capitalization was for emphasis. The original meaning prior to texting and tech gave it a new one.

Again I apologize. It’s not my intent to ever offend anyone here.

Apology accepted.
 
I don’t. I can only find reference to them in articles. o_O I’m gonna keep trying to find them though.

Found this on another discussion, does this work for the details of motions filed by AWs lawyers last week?

"You can read all the titles by going to. https://www.pikecountycpcourt.org and searching for Angela Wagner. Choose case #2018CR000156 and scroll down to the entries made on 12/14/2018."
 
Idk. There's a pic of GW3 and, I think B, that was uploaded on 4/27/2015. They're at the Peterson home.

Yeah, I remember. Idk if AW & G3 ever separated or not, but I do recall a long convo & iirc, some claimed to have knowledge that they did separate, reunite, separate, reunite......which, is not unusual. We all have that one friend in a drama packed relationship. We never know, are they together this week or is this “split” week.
 
Found this on another discussion, does this work for the details of motions filed by AWs lawyers last week?

"You can read all the titles by going to. https://www.pikecountycpcourt.org and searching for Angela Wagner. Choose case #2018CR000156 and scroll down to the entries made on 12/14/2018."
Thank you! That’s what I’ve been doing wrong. I’ve been referencing the other Pike Co website.
 
It's too late for me to quote, but thanks IQuestion and Trudie for your comments about the FBI. I did not know the FBI was involved, but of course, they could have been.
How big was the Pike County murders investigation? 

The FBI is on this list. IMO, they are instrumental in any type of “bug”, as it’s much easier for them to secure a warrant for interception devices. Small town LE is not likely to have the sophistication required to do so.

Link supplied by Betty, earlier.
 
BBM

One client who works in surveillance at a casino told me they even have cameras in the ladies bathroom. Not in the stall area but in the sink areas where you wash your hands. She said there is nowhere in that casino that is not covered both inside and outside by surveillance cameras. She said they also use facial recognition software.

Believe you 100%. That facial recognition software is the stuff. Not saying I'm particularly fond of it, mind you. When I load a particular grandchild's pic on FB, FB will tag the child as their adult parent. This child is not even in double digits yet, and, I guess their facial structure is very similar, so it tags the child as the parent! I allow their photos to only be seen by a handful of FB Friends/Fam.

Walmart is wired up too! Sometimes, when I notice one of their cams, I'll pause, then wave and say cheese. :D Seeing that the Ws shopped for their supplies at Walmart, they can't be very tech savvy, or hadn't heard of WallyWorld's rep. Then again, maybe it was what they call the Dunning-Kruger effect. The DK effect, is, basically, people who are less competent, but overestimate their abilities. It goes in reverse too. A lot of folks who are very competent, do not see themselves as such. I think this may describe our four accused of murder. The DK effect, though I'm not a psychologist, keeps rising to the top for me, with these four (along w/possible ASPD for at least two of the four). It could explain some of their bold behaviour.

The least skilled person often overestimates their ability because they have no idea how much they don’t know. In other words, poor performers believe they know everything in a particular subject and therefore they tend to be overconfident about it.

One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision. —Bertrand Russell

Dunning-Kruger Effect: Why People Think They're Smart Even When They're Not
 
Believe you 100%. That facial recognition software is the stuff. Not saying I'm particularly fond of it, mind you. When I load a particular grandchild's pic on FB, FB will tag the child as their adult parent. This child is not even in double digits yet, and, I guess their facial structure is very similar, so it tags the child as the parent! I allow their photos to only be seen by a handful of FB Friends/Fam.

Walmart is wired up too! Sometimes, when I notice one of their cams, I'll pause, then wave and say cheese. :D Seeing that the Ws shopped for their supplies at Walmart, they can't be very tech savvy, or hadn't heard of WallyWorld's rep. Then again, maybe it was what they call the Dunning-Kruger effect. The DK effect, is, basically, people who are less competent, but overestimate their abilities. It goes in reverse too. A lot of folks who are very competent, do not see themselves as such. I think this may describe our four accused of murder. The DK effect, though I'm not a psychologist, keeps rising to the top for me, with these four (along w/possible ASPD for at least two of the four). It could explain some of their bold behaviour.




Dunning-Kruger Effect: Why People Think They're Smart Even When They're Not

I think 2 fit the description, the other two, IMO, follow.
 
How big was the Pike County murders investigation?

The FBI is on this list. IMO, they are instrumental in any type of “bug”, as it’s much easier for them to secure a warrant for interception devices. Small town LE is not likely to have the sophistication required to do so.

Link supplied by Betty, earlier.

Exactly. And I don't know how much Alaska is going to want to bug someone's house (assuming it was bugged) in their state based on a request from a DA from a small county in Ohio.
 
Found this on another discussion, does this work for the details of motions filed by AWs lawyers last week?

"You can read all the titles by going to. https://www.pikecountycpcourt.org and searching for Angela Wagner. Choose case #2018CR000156 and scroll down to the entries made on 12/14/2018."

How about this one? Sounds like they are going to say there are Mitigating factors to save her from the DP.

2/14/2018 (29) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE VENIREPERSONS WHO CANNOT FAIRLY CONSIDER MITIGATING EVIDENCE AND/OR WHO WOULD AUTOMATICALLY VOTE FOR DEATH UPON A FINDING OF GUILT IN THE CULPABILITY PHASE FILED
 
When one types in all caps, and double spacing, in "internet speak" so to say, that's interpreted as, yelling at someone. Ftr, I'm not confused at all.
Well emphasis is important to o
When one types in all caps, and double spacing, in "internet speak" so to say, that's interpreted as, yelling at someone. Ftr, I'm not confused at all.
When one types in all caps, and double spacing, in "internet speak" so to say, that's interpreted as, yelling at someone. Ftr, I'm not confused at all.
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...amily-arrested-39.405455/reply?quote=14644721
You are absolutely correct. I should probably perfect the use of slangs and emogees.
Thank you for being a perfect example of internet speak. I have been skoooled. This is how I speak. I guess it is just my creative personality who can not resist the bolds, italics, underlining, capitalization, script size, emogees. It is just so much fun to use them. I feel like a robot typing this way. Yuck.
 
Last edited:
12/14/2018(1) DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR NOTICE OF STATE'S EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO OHIO R.CRIM. P. 12(E)(2) FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(2) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF EXCULPATORY AND IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(3) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF THE JUVENILE RECORDS OF PLAINTIFF'S WITNESSES FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(4) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCLOSURE OF AGGRAVATING FACTORS AND INFORMATION RELATING TO MITIGATING FACTORS FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(5) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS TO TURN OVER AND ADVISE THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF ALL INFORMATION ACQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF INVESTIGATION FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(6) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THAT A COMPLETE COPY OF THE PROSECUTOR'S FILE BE MADE AND TURNED OVER TO THE COURT FOR RVIEW AND TO BE SEALED FOR APPELLATE REVIEW, IF NECESSARY FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(7) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROPERLY PRESERVE AND CATALOG ALL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(8) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSCRIBE THE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS PRIOR TO TRIAL FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A PRE-TRIAL COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(10( DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISCLOSE NAMES OF GRAND JURY WITNESSES FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(11) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS CAPITAL COMPONENTS OF THIS CASE DUE TO CONSTITUTIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW VIOLATIONS FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(12) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ALL MOTIONS TO BE HEARD ON THE RECORD FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(13) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RULINGS ON ALL MOTIONS NO LATER THAN THE START OF VOIR DIRE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(14) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A STENOGRAPHIC RECORD OF ALL COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(15) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RECORD ALL SIDEBAR PROCEEDINGS FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(16) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DAILY TRANSCRIPTS FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(17) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RESTRAIN CERTAIN PARTIES FROM DISCUSSING THE CASE WITH ACCUSED FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(18) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PERMIT ACCUSED TO APPEAR IN CIVILIAN CLOTHING AND WITHOUT RESTRAINTS AT ALL PROCEEDINGS FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(19) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF VENUE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(20) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO HAVE REASONS FOR DEFENSE OBJECTIONS AND REASONS FOR OVERRULING DEFENSE OBJECTIONS PLACED ON THE RECORD FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(21) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT ANY REFERENCES TO THE FIRST PHASE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS AS THE "GUILT PHASE" FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(22) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A COURTROOM DECORUM ORDER TO ENSURE A FAIR TRIAL FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(23) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUBMIT A DETAILED JURY QUESTIONNAIRE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(24) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIAL PROCEDURES TO INSULATE THE VENIRE AND THE EMPANELLED JURY FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(25) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEQUESTERED VOIR DIRE ON DEATH PENALTY, PUBLICITY, AND OTHER ISSUES FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(26) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ALTERNATING INDIVIDUAL VOIR DIRE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(27) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COMPREHENSIVE VOIR DIRE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(28) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO HAVE THE COURT FOLLOW THE O.R.C. 2945.25(C) STANDARD FOR "DEATH-QUALIFICATION" OF VENIREPERSONS FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(29) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE VENIREPERSONS WHO CANNOT FAIRLY CONSIDER MITIGATING EVIDENCE AND/OR WHO WOULD AUTOMATICALLY VOTE FOR DEATH UPON A FINDING OF GUILT IN THE CULPABILITY PHASE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(30) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT THE STATE'S USE OF PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES TO EXCLUDE VENIREPERSONS WITH CONCERNS ABOUT IMPOSING THE DEATH PENALTY FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(31) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING OHIO R. EVID. 803(8): LIMITED ADMISSIBILITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT RECORDS FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(32) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING THE INADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR TESTIMONY FROM A WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(33) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE RELATING TO OTHER CRIMES, WRONGS OR ACTS FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(34) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT THE PREJUDICIAL DISPLAY OF TANGIBLE THINGS AND/OR PHOTOGRAPHS DURING TRIAL FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(35) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE DECEASED FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(36) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT VICTIM-IMPACT EVIDENCE DURING THE TRIAL AND, IF NECESSARY, THE MITIGATION PHASE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(37) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DETERMINE AND LIMIT PLAINTIFF'S SENTENCING PHASE EVIDENCE OUTSIDE THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(38) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT THE STATE FROM EMPLOYING PREJUDICIAL ARGUMENTS AND THEMES FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(39) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR INSTRUCTION THAT THE DEFENDANT BEARS NO BURDEN OF PROOF AT THE MITIGATING PHASE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(40) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS RELATED TO ANY "MENTAL HEALTH" EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN MITIGATION FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(41) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO LIMIT SCOPE OF ANY REBUTTAL EVIDENCE OFFERED BY THE STATE IN THE MITIGATION PHASE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(42) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT THE PROSECUTOR FROM ARGUING AND THE COURT FROM GIVING INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING STATUTORY MITIGATING FACTORS NOT RAISED BY THE DEFENSE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(43) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF MITIGATING EVIDENCE THAT POST-DATES DEFENDANT'S ARREST FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(44) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AVOID COERCIVE PRACTICES DURING MITIGATION PHASE DELIBERATIONS FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(45) DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT THE STATE FROM COMMENTING ON DEFENDANT'S UNSWORN STATEMENT FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(46) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROHIBIT REFERENCES TO THE JURY THAT A DEATH PENALTY VERDICT IS ONLY A RECOMMENDATION TO THE TRIAL JUDGE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(47) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ALLOW THE DEFENSE TO ARGUE LAST AT THE MITIGATION PHASE FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(48) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR WRITTEN JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND AN OPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THEM BEFORE THE JURY IS INSTRUCTED FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F12/14/2018(49) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO INSTRUCT THE JURY TO CONSIDER MERCY IN ITS MITIGATION PHASE DELIBERATIONS, AND TO PROHIBIT THE PROSECUTOR FROM ARGUING THAT THE JURY SHOULD NOT CONSIDER MERCY FILED Attorney: KRAPENC, ROBERT F
 
Exactly. And I don't know how much Alaska is going to want to bug someone's house (assuming it was bugged) in their state based on a request from a DA from a small county in Ohio.

Any LE will Assist upon request.
Some Ohioans got trips of a lifetime traveling to AK, working this case.
I’m so jealous y’all have clean houses, Xmas gifts wrapped & have time to discuss this. Me, I have a date with my vacuum & my Maytag is craving some attention.
 
Not criticizing, (and my comments are not related to the photographer at all).

But does anyone else get the impression the photos look "off", a bit staged perhaps?

I see a very large structure but never more than a handful of "congregants" (from the group home?) Wouldn't there be more congregants in the pews on "picture day"? Could it have been just be an "illusion" for the tax break (503c)? JMO
 
Last edited:
OK, thanks, I'll take your word for it. It seems like a big ask to me, but maybe not.

Local, state and federal law enforcement agencies keep the peace by working together
I don’t understand what you mean, sorry.
LE has no jurisdiction outside of their own jurisdiction. If Ohio wanted to bring someone back from AK, they transmit the warrant to authorities.
Remember when GW3 was arrested in KY, iirc, “he was arrested by Lexington police & the OBCI”. Ohio had to inform KY of intent.
 
Last edited:
How about this one? Sounds like they are going to say there are Mitigating factors to save her from the DP.

2/14/2018 (29) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE VENIREPERSONS WHO CANNOT FAIRLY CONSIDER MITIGATING EVIDENCE AND/OR WHO WOULD AUTOMATICALLY VOTE FOR DEATH UPON A FINDING OF GUILT IN THE CULPABILITY PHASE FILED
Mitigating circumstances could be anything. For example “the defendant is a wife, mother, grandmother, daughter, sister, and niece. The defense asks the jurors to consider the impact the death penalty will have on the defendent and her loved ones”. OR, “the defense ask the jurors to consider the defendants religious beliefs and in doing so, the defense offers that the defendant being sentenced to death goes against her deep religious beliefs”. There’s A LOT of things that can be mitigating factors when pleading against the death penalty sentence to a jury. JMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
127
Guests online
267
Total visitors
394

Forum statistics

Threads
609,251
Messages
18,251,367
Members
234,585
Latest member
Mocha55
Back
Top