A quick google search of custody issues resulting in murder provides numerous examples of people who have killed over child custody.
The only difference in this case is the victims lived in separate locations versus all living in one home. That’s what confuses people. Had all 8 victims been in one home, I have serious doubts so many would question that custody is the motive.
Where did Chris get the money for down payment on Dana’s home?
He very well could have thought DS's cattin' around had ended early and he was coming back. A shock stick is a very good thought w/larger dogs like they had.
The Ws also raised dogs, large dogs, and were dog people (I hate typing that), so they probably knew their way around the R dogs. I read in one article that they even used pets in some of their surveillance. They had probably been running night surveillance for awhile and on those back, dark, roads, if they were noticed, it was just the Ws or their boys, out late. They probably knew just what time that CR1 let his dogs out for the last time, at night, too. BJM said it was odd that they were on the porch that morning.
During the day, while KR was at work, they could have been dropping by, and getting friendly with Brownie, by tossing him a peanut butter ball or beef liver snacks. DR's dogs would already know them as would CR1s, and no one pays any attention to a slew of coon hounds sounding off.
RSBMPeople here have discussed through 35 Threads all the evidence the public was allowed to have. Many, many theories of what might have happened and who might be responsible have been discussed for 2.5 years right here. You might want to read some of the older threads... believe me, alternative theories have been discussed.
plus Kennedy living 10 minutes away and not really in line for custody
It could be a huge reason why eight would die if not earned legally
They bought stolen items that’s a big jump to go from buying stolen items to murderFrom what i understand, and please correct me if i'm wrong, but the Rhoden family weren't felons. The Wagners are. They have proven over and over again that they are willing to break the law to get what they want, and then expect people to turn the other way.
They bought stolen items that’s a big jump to go from buying stolen items to murder
They stole items too.They bought stolen items that’s a big jump to go from buying stolen items to murder
They took something they wanted and expected to not get into trouble for it. It's not a big leap when talking about a custody case. They wanted custody. They got it. They even tried to demand mandatory visitation for a child they weren't related to.They bought stolen items that’s a big jump to go from buying stolen items to murder
If it were over drugs why kill the whole family? If CR1 and KR were running drugs and someone wanted them out of the way, why kill DR, HR, CR2, FR and HHG?
Why not just kill CR1 and KR? That would have solved the competition problem as I am sure DR would not have continued with growing and selling MJ with CR1 gone.
Also if they were such big time drug dealers why was DR working for peanuts in a nursing home?
JMO[/Q
i meant Wagner’s bought stolen itemsThey stole items too.
They bought stolen items that’s a big jump to go from buying stolen items to murder
and the wagners stole items as well.i meant Wagner’s bought stolen items
And I mean that Angela stole from her employer.i meant Wagner’s bought stolen items
They are trying to portray the Wagner’s as the smartest dumbest killers ever. Many in pike county say they have a hard time believing the Wagner’s are the killers.
It could be a huge reason why eight would die if not earned legally
Its not such a big jump when you consider:
Wagners
Had in their possesion parts to make silencers country folk
Brass catchers ——-country folk
illegal fully Automatic riffles ————country folk
Bug detector devices ————don’t have anything for this one
forged custody documents ———-forged after murder to make sure the baby didn’t go into state custody like the others
were caught talking about killing LE, BCI and AG - ———-talking out of anger wasn’t planning on doing it
And fled to alaska- ———-Alaska was not for protection from the law
I'm sure iv'e missed some, but that points towards more guilt than any other theories i have heard
But were they? They were dated before murders but were they really made beforethe forged documents were done before the murders