It is a range of addresses. 14792 , from the streetview, appears to be Evergreen High School. The other number, panned 360° shows various single family homes.Did anyone else realize this isn't JDW'S home? Or is this the trailer on the property?http://cloud.tapatalk.com/s/57a6d17be1d9a/Screenshot_20160807-020539.png?
Note:
DNA obtained from this residence and note time DNA taken.
Ottootto otto is offline
Registered User
Join Date
Jan 2004
Posts
25,260
Quote Originally Posted by TDW59 View Post
Otto, I have just spent a big chunk of time trying to find the "reader's digest abridged version" of the speculated timeline you posted to me. Cannot find it. Your original one with theory is page 40 thread 5. the short version should be 4 or 5 pages or more after that.
do you have better search skills?
Not really - let's build it again:
6:30-6:45 Sierah abducted
6:30-800 Police ask for witnesses to motorcyclist with open face helmet near bicycle location
Worley cell phone pings for 2 hours near bicycle location
10PM boyfriend unable to reach Sierah
11PM Sierah reported missing
12:03AM Sierah bike located
TIME ?? Police canvas Worley property (I thought this was 3AM, a few hours later, but I might be mistaken)
Warrant times ??
Attached is location of bike, Worley property, and body.
Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version.
Name:SierahJoughin.jpg
Views:38
Size:64.6 KB
ID:99513
Name search............There were 2 of them...didn't know who the one was and why.
Check the names of those swabbed for DNA......most likely one of those people live at that address.It is a range of addresses. 14792 , from the streetview, appears to be Evergreen High School. The other number, panned 360° shows various single family homes.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk
I had a turned around number...they are the range of the school complexes.Check the names of those stabbed for DNA......most likely one of those people live at that address.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Ok so that's where they gathered evidence and maybe asked for certain people to volunteer DNA? I don't know why a family member would be there otherwise.I had a turned around number...they are the range of the school complexes.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk
I can't read the second name.Ok so that's where they gathered evidence and maybe asked for certain people to volunteer DNA? I don't know why a family member would be there otherwise.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
And he may not be able to get there alone?Ok so that's where they gathered evidence and maybe asked for certain people to volunteer DNA? I don't know why a family member would be there otherwise.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
That's why I got it!! Read up!!! The date of the warrant I'm referring to is 7/24. Her body was found 7/23 and not on his property. They had "reason to believe" there was a human remain. That's the legal aspect. The reality is IMO they found a body, but couldn't do anything with it bc they didn't have a warrant. Besides it COMPLETELY matches up with local rumors. Not that, that means anything, but people talk, and that's the reality.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
I have no knowledge on how search warrants work so this may be a simple question to many but I am sure some people are wondering also. They were at his property originally to find things that would be evidence in SJ's case. Now let us suppose tests determine that the blood found on the barn walls is not Ce's but another possible victim(s). I am going to figure that to LE and forensics it was obvious almost immediately by the amounts found as well as the different states of deterioration of blood evidence some were likely older. Does LE then need to get another warrant in order for that to used for evidence in a case against JDW in her abduction and probable death? Do they need to get another warrant worded in the way that the one Notnice26 posted that states we suspect multiple things will be found that come from multiple victims so that everything and anything incriminating found can be used as evidence for any victims they find any DNA for. Can they run the DNA through the victim database for potential matches prior to getting one that states looking for evidence of other victims?
I know that many times things that should be simple are often made complicated just to be sure that all the T's are crossed and the i's dotted. I honestly I feel sympathy for the LEO's that have to deal with all this paperwork and redundancy when all they want to do is be able to bring closure to families. It is just really sad that many times families don't get to see justice served in their loved one's name in cases because of some insignificant technical detail that got overlooked in the initial investigation of another vics case. Hopefully this makes sense to anyone but me.
I think (someone please correct me if I'm wrong) that if the warrant states specifically "blood evidence" or whatever, that then any and all blood evidence found is fair game, regardless of who the DNA ends up belonging to.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
To rule out as a participant in a crime possibly. Or to exclude the person from saying that wasn't mine it belongs to xxOk so that's where they gathered evidence and maybe asked for certain people to volunteer DNA? I don't know why a family member would be there otherwise.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk