Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ditto. I don't want to put down Betty Pat Gatliff, because she has, after all, been a pioneer in the forensic art field, but her clay recons seems like they're based on one single mold which she has put a wig on. And the wigs basically have the same do, too.I don't usually dump on the reconstructions because I've poked at it a little bit myself and I know how terribly hard it is. But that reconstruction looks like somebody's mother, not a young woman wearing lace underwear.
I saw where she was never reported missing and NOTHING about her husband. If I had a guess I would say someone killed her then told everyone she went back to colorado.Apparently, Katrina Kay Burton Bentivegna was never listed in NAMUS?
Still wondering if she was reported missing.
jmho ymmv lrr
I saw where she was never reported missing and NOTHING about her husband. If I had a guess I would say someone killed her then told everyone she went back to colorado.
Ditto. I don't want to put down Betty Pat Gatliff, because she has, after all, been a pioneer in the forensic art field, but her clay recons seems like they're based on one single mold which she has put a wig on. And the wigs basically have the same do, too.
@GreenHairedGirlie's rendring turned out to eerily close, though!
Of course its all an assumption, technically she could just have left on her own being heavily pregnant with child no 2 and leaving child no 1 behind...and husband really had no idea about her whereabouts... but something does not make sense here.
JMOO
I don't believe she was pregnant when she was murdered. I believe the crime report stated she was a woman who had given birth.
You could be correct. "Possible one term or near-term pregnancy. Right handed." I've always thought that the body was of a woman who had been pregnant and given birth but I might be misinterpreting the information. They have never released a lot of information or the autopsy report as far as I know. If she was pregnant then they should have some DNA from the baby's remains, especially if it was near term. That would be an awesome clue especially if the baby wasn't her husbands! I just don't think that is case.Then I misinterpreted the "skeletal finds: near term pregnancy". But does not change much