Snipped for focus.
Then why didn't the family simply express sadness and disappointment that TC was using again? If they had to express anything at all in public about his drug use. They knew. They knew quite a while ago that PCP had been found in the car. And because of the presence of the drugs in the car, and his history, it was overwhelmingly likely TC was going to be positive for at least one drug, the PCP, at autopsy-- and he ended up being positive for TWO hallucinogens. So this was no big surprise to them, IMO.
We don't know how much was in "the vial", but
any PCP in the car for a man with a history of long term use and convictions for trafficking is not just "bad" or "unfortunate"-- it is CRIMINAL, and incriminating, and meant that he would have been facing felony charges and prison AGAIN. And depending on how much was in the "vial", the charges could have been for more than possession-- intent to distribute.
So, I can't interpret their comment as simply "we're sad he was using again". The hypocrisy of their comment, IMO, literally screams "we're frustrated and annoyed that the medical examiner CAUGHT him using again, because it's not just unfortunate, but it's criminal, and we know that. And we've been through this so many times with him."
And if we want to talk about "classy" behavior-- the man is only dead a few days, and the autopsy isn't even complete, and his FAMILY is in the news fighting over which one gets to file a civil lawsuit! That's disgusting, IMO, and really unseemly behavior. And apparently TC and the common law wife BOTH lost custody of their children, which got splashed into the media with their hurry to see who could file lawsuits first to get money. So much for protecting the privacy of the kids. So no, I don't think this family has behaved in a "classy" or respectable way at all. This is their PUBLIC behavior I'm criticizing. They could have simply asked for privacy, and stayed out of the media all together, but they didn't. They even posed for pictures and gave press conferences, so they are fair game for criticism.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/terence-crutcher-parents-widow-fight-estate-article-1.2807189
It is interesting that different people can view the same set of events, and come to completely different conclusions. That's an example of the greatness of "diversity", right? And that's what a jury does.
The comments and interpretations I've posted are sure to be brought up by Officer Shelby's attorney team, as well. Just because she is charged, doesn't mean she is guilty. It's my opinion that the prosecutor was FAR too eager and premature to file charges. The investigation was far from complete. That may end up being a serious miscalculation, IMO, just as it was for Marilyn Mosby in Baltimore. Because it smacks of malicious prosecution for political reasons. Not a good image for a prosecutor, IMO.