I think their goal was to get away with this crime.I'm still thinking about a point I raised in my last post. If TA had not called Brune to tell her she wouldn't be needed, then VB would have been alone in her car driving to the meeting place for the child exchange. Well, I guess I don't know that, because I don't know where Brune lives. But I would assume Brune lives closer to TA than to VB, and I wouldn't expect VB to pick up Brune on her way to get the kids, like she picked up JK. Brune would have been with TA and the kids waiting to meet VB that morning, if plans had not changed at TA's request. So VB would've been alone and an easy, vulnerable target for the murderers. And no need to kill JK who had done nothing to them (not that VB had either.)
I thought at first that TA told Brune she was not needed, because she didn't want to put her in harm's way when they killed VB. But now I realized that Brune wouldn't have been riding w/VB, like JK was, so she would've been safely away from the murder scene anyway. Then I thought TA must have thought she had to do it this way to avoid letting Brune in on their evil plan. But that makes no sense either, because if Brune wasn't at the scene, she wouldn't have to be told anything. She wouldn't know who the murderers were. Well, she probably would have, but that's true, whether she'd been told to stay home or not. Whether TA had told VB she had to bring someone with her to supervise the visit this time. Nothing would've been any different, as far as what Brune would have to be told. Brune likely would've suspected it was TA equally the same, whether she was expecting to supervise or not. Whether they were staying w/their original plan or
going to Plan B, as they did.
So I probably am not making this very clear, but I'm just saying, JK didn't have to die for any reason I can come up with. I previously thought she had to die (in the murderers' minds) just because she would have to be riding w/VB, and I guess they didn't want her to be able to identify them (collateral damage). But why did she have to be riding w/VB at that time? I know the supposed reason, because she was to be the visit supervisor since TA's usual person wasn't doing it this time. But why wasn't her usual person there this time? Because TA told her not to be!
WHY?
see what I'm saying?
If the original lady was told to take time off and TA didn't tell VB this so she could get a replacement, then THAT would have came out in the investigation. So if VB and JK just disappeared, then TA doesn't really look suspicious just for telling the original lady to take time off. She could have just been trying to make things more difficult for VB.
I think the original woman couldn't be along because the kids were not going to be along either.
If the car and 2 women totally disspaeared then would we even be where we are right now? I think they wanted both women and the car to be gone. We might still be talking about this years from now thinking they had an accident somewhere and the car was never found. I can see that being what TA thought would happen, but it all went wrong.