http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/news/cityregion/23463882-41/story.csp
This article states the first little boy died after hitting the handle bars on a 4 wheel type toy? blunt force trauma to the abdomen. I don't understand that. Not saying it couldn't happen but I'm having trouble picturing it.
I'm having trouble picturing that happen, too.
Here's a link again to the old article about the boy who died from the 4 wheel toy. It shows a picture of a plastic 4 wheel toy and i am wondering if it is the toy that had supposed killed him..
http://www.kval.com/news/25791374.html
It's plastic.. and it looks like it may have a pad on the front handlebars type thing of it. Not sure if this is the toy or not.
In the article it says a mini tricycle, so i would assume it was a 3 wheeled toy.
How fast could a 2 year old baby actually go on a tricycle? To cause so much blunt force impact trauma to sever a liver?
Then the Bauman waits 2 hours to call for help and uses the neighbor's phone.. did she see it happen? If she didn't then she was neglecting to properly watch the children, and if she did see it, she would have seen if the impact of the fall was bad or not and should have called 911 ASAP.
It's not Bauman's child to begin with, you'd think she would err on the side of caution, especially being responsible for someone else's child..
Then not hardly a year and a half later another baby dies while under her care, this one chokes.
Either the woman has extemely bad luck with children, or something else is going on.
It says in one of the articles this 2nd time she has turned to the internet:
"Meanwhile, instead of on camera,
Bauman is turning to the Internet to express her remorse over losing another child.
"
Why must some take the loss of a family member and try to turn it into more than what it is," she wrote on her Facebook page. "Miss you linky dinky doo."
http://www.kval.com/news/70722992.html
IMO, i see no remorse in that statement, so i have no idea what the article means she is expressing it..
What i do see is her saying that people are trying to turn the whole situation of the second death of a child under her care into something more. Now who is she referring to that is doing this? The police?
Does she run a licensed daycare or not?
Perhaps she has a form of Münchausen syndrome by proxy. Did she ever have any of her own children die when they were newborns or infants by any chance?
I also agree with Mayelf, i think it's odd she would continue to do daycare after the death of the first child.
Maybe she liked the attention she got the first time around, idk, she could have a mental illness, something is not right with this at all, imo