As per the rationale sections in the conclusion of '
The cricket bat': If you think the evidence suggests that the marks on the toe end of the face of the bat are prise marks from levering out the toilet door panel and you think they are made in blood then Oscar must have used the bat to stage the opening of the door. This means that in all probability the door wasn't locked and he used the bat a second time after shooting Reeva to stage the opening of the door (e.g. to explain the other bat marks already on the door).
We're not putting our version up yet but ...
Other staging: I'm thinking of anything post shooting Reeva and a few unexplained bits before. A lot of things make more sense if you think of how you would expect him to have reacted if he was going to deny responsibility. He had very little time to think and we think he may have made a host of mistakes in what he did next but was very lucky because Nel pursued very little of that part of his version and didn't recall Van der Nest.
The whole thing in the toilet doesn't make sense because the blood spatter doesn't appear to support his version and nor does Van der Nest's re-enactment. If he held her as he says, with her bloody head on his left shoulder as he sat with his back against the wall by the door opening, where is the blood on the floor? And if he moved Reeva as he describes (see ER video for his re-enactment) how did the blood on the floor in the far right corner of the toilet get there?
So what is this all about? If it's not true was he perhaps
justifying why he moved Reeva? If he says he believes she was dead (wasn't breathing - which he only adds at trial but also re-enacts in a supporting sequence of the ER video - she was alive when he found her in the bail affidavit) then no one is too concerned why he doesn't call an ambulance first. After all, what can they do if she's dead? So he says he sits there, he doesn't know how long. Then she breathes and he has no choice but to move her because she's on top of him, so he moves her out of the toilet. If this version if correct no one would later ask why he moved her. And remember, this version only came out months after the event (perhaps ~Sep 2013 when he met Scott Roder's team). Of course, if it's not true, it doesn't answer why he moved her in the first place.