FWIW, paraphrasing of sequence, as we will never see a transcript of this, I s'pose:
roux's "flip side" from ten mins ago. He talked very fast, on purpose, presumably. (Ah well, Masipa has the transcript, no matter!) Mitigation
Op has paid - he lists about 20 ways Op has paid for the crime already.
- his future with his loved one, paid via health, emotionally, shell of a man ( Scholtz & pastor testified so) , he is a broken man, paid re career, re money, re identity, ( lots more examples given)
However OP will commit himself to public service, he will pay back to society , in the past he contributed to society a great deal through sports & disability. ( even includes Iceland woman & disabled son)
The court found that he changed perception on disability. Not just Iceland family- but broader impact than that.
Tried to meet Steenkamps but deemed as inapt then. Fine, but he is DESPERATE to meet them. ( You abs w- er , so that's what the show of trying to go up to their bench was on day 1 break)
BSC management LSE online, he will have to stop if he goes back to prison as no internet access at Kgosi, he has tried that
New aggravation introduced from SCA- there is nothing really new to increase/aggravate the sentence
OK, SCA found DE not CH. eg. No escape from toilet, eg. reconciled himself to shooting
But Masipa, you already found this. Masipa found error in persona. He reads off that passage from Masipa's old judgement - so it's not new aggravation
In sentencing masipa found it bordered DE .
Is it one degree up or below the border? IDK how to calculate this.
Masipa found weapon was lethal and 4 shots , small cubicle, he was gun trained - so you already found that
there is nothing new here comparing SCA to Masipa judgment
Only difference = Masipa found it bordered DE. Yet SCA found it was DE
SCA mentioned warning shot.
Just because PPD not found by SCA does not equal extra aggravation. Let's look at findings- numbers a raft in a list:
Op was frightened
It was dark 3am, window opened
Vuln due to disability - pervasive vulnerability
Oliveirra case? ferrera case? No idea- cannot catch his pronunciation
GAD - and heightened by 3am darkness
Fight not flight- derman
Intruder perception even if no intruder
Perception RS was in bedroom not the bathroom
None of these findings disappear. All the same. there was no evil intent on OP's part
( Pardon my French)
Anyway, all good as it bears repeating.
