Irishboy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 920
- Reaction score
- 535
I've seen the documentary. I'll agree that it's a form of brainwashing/Stockholm Syndrome for both but I still think it's different and the two shouldn't be compared. Comparing is what leads people to the (false) impression that A is in less danger than someone in a situation like ES was in. Because people figure since A went willingly she is culpable for her actions. Because Esterly has known her since she was 7 and supposedly treated her like a daughter people want to believe he is being kind to her and won't harm her. But the harm he has already done will take years of therapy for her to overcome (if she comes back alive). And at some point he may decide to get rid of A because she is a key piece of evidence against him. She is in great danger and she may not even know it. JMHO.
*Sorry if I'm touchy about this subject but some of the victim-blaming comments I have read on social media on this case are disgusting.
I agree that she is not in any less danger. Even Cummins and MCET were in a place called Slab City where he kept a gun. went on a test ride in the bay on a kayak. We have no idea what this guy has exposed her to. No one is blaming her, only explaining the extent of the control over her.