Identified! PA - Delaware Co, Ridley Creek State Park, WhtFem 25-45, UP14642, rings w/initials, Jan'16 - Name Withheld

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Whether the rings belonged to the victim is really important to this case. Even if the victim was estranged from family for years, I would think the family would have a sense if the rings belonged to her.
 
Whether the rings belonged to the victim is really important to this case. Even if the victim was estranged from family for years, I would think the family would have a sense if the rings belonged to her.
I agree. Next to knowing her name, for me, I'm curious about the initials on the ring, since we've had numerous discussions about them over the years. But if they turned out to be her initials, I can see why they wouldn't release that information, as it most likely would lead to us discovering her name.
 
Harrisburg, PA – Today, Governor Josh Shapiro presented the Governor’s Awards for Excellence to 54 Commonwealth employees from eight state agencies and thanked all state employees for their dedication to public service.

----------------------------------------------------------
Criminal Investigation Assessment Unit – Pennsylvania State Police
Jeffrey Baney, Teddi Hesser, Amy Kreiger, and Todd McCurdy

For being the national model for a “cold case” unit and bringing resolution to unsolved homicides in Pennsylvania. This team initiated a cost-saving alternative for their personnel to conduct in-house forensic genetic genealogy research. Soon after being certified, the team quickly identified a deceased Jane Doe from 2016, bringing closure to the victim’s family. Five long term unsolved homicide cases were also successfully cleared by their efforts.

 
The Philadelphia case is witheld due to active investigations and probably sensitive information ive heard (I guess crime/drug related).
Not sure if there is a law that names have to be released if there is no investigation. I guess it is up to the family and LE.
There is no law.
If and when someone is charged with her murder, her name would likely become public record. That is because the charges would state the name of the defendant and victim.

Other than that, there is no obligation.
 
Long time lurker, first time poster. She is still listed in Namus. Anyone know/can speculate on the reason for that?
I have absolutely no idea if this is the case, this is speculation only, but I'm wondering if they have her still listed on NamUs so that, in the event they find skeletal remains in the area that they believe could belong to her, they could compare them to her stats in CODIS?
 
Withholding the name of a dead person is done for a number of reasons, such as allowing for proper notification of next-of-kin, or because release of that identity might jeopardize an active homicide investigation.

But after a reasonable amount of time, and after repeated requests for public assistance, the deceased person's name should be released.
 
Withholding the name of a dead person is done for a number of reasons, such as allowing for proper notification of next-of-kin, or because release of that identity might jeopardize an active homicide investigation.

But after a reasonable amount of time, and after repeated requests for public assistance, the deceased person's name should be released.
A family's request for privacy will always trump any public curiosity.
 
A family's request for privacy will always trump any public curiosity.

"Public curiosity" has nothing to do with it.

This case is one which remains an unsolved homicide. If there was a killer involved, then releasing the victim's name could result in the killer's identification and capture.

The family was certainly afforded their privacy, since LE knew her name for over a year before they thought it important enough to mention that she had been identified. Did they state beyond any doubt that her death was not something intentional?
 
"Public curiosity" has nothing to do with it.

This case is one which remains an unsolved homicide. If there was a killer involved, then releasing the victim's name could result in the killer's identification and capture.

The family was certainly afforded their privacy, since LE knew her name for over a year before they thought it important enough to mention that she had been identified. Did they state beyond any doubt that her death was not something intentional?
Ultimately we don’t know what LE knows. If the family doesn’t want a victim’s name released we need to honor that. Harper Jane Doe’s name was never released. That doesn’t mean her killer won’t be caught or they don’t know who he is.
 
Ultimately we don’t know what LE knows. If the family doesn’t want a victim’s name released we need to honor that. Harper Jane Doe’s name was never released. That doesn’t mean her killer won’t be caught or they don’t know who he is.
And this lady in Philly (Kensington) - clearly a homicide. Her name, AFAIK, has never been released.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
73
Guests online
1,685
Total visitors
1,758

Forum statistics

Threads
600,909
Messages
18,115,507
Members
230,991
Latest member
DeeKay
Back
Top