Jmoose
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2009
- Messages
- 7,049
- Reaction score
- 54,008
So I know that a blood alcohol reading from a drowning victim can be drastically lower than it would be had it been taken when they were alive......I'm guessing along with actual numbers from the tests some guessing and estimation has to go on to come to a number they believe he would have been at at time of death. So.......if they come to the conclusion that his BAC was NOT high enough to render him intoxicated, then what? Will everyone still believe he ended up in that water accidentally (of his own accord....i.e. playing around and fell in, etc.)? Or will some change their views to suicide or what? Just wondering. And what then would you make of the stumbling video?
Respectfully submitted-but don't you have that backward? Wouldn't Shane likely have a higher than is accurate BAC due to being in the water? I recall that when Sarah Majoras' BAC came back super high, lots of people were saying that it was so high because of the condition of her body. I doubt that it'll mean much after all the time in the water. I wonder if drug test results will be made public-that might mean more, if the tox screen is accurate.
It wouldn't surprise me a bit to hear through the grapevine that staff at Kildare's are selling drugs