Attaque de Paris : l’enquête privilégie la piste terroriste
Paris attack: the investigation focuses on the terrorist motive
As early as this Thursday, a number of indications were in favour of the terrorist hypothesis, including the premeditation of the act, which is not consistent with a delirious outburst.
Parisian police were hit on Thursday by an unprecedented attack.
After long hours of evaluating the evidence gathered, the national anti-terrorist prosecutor's office took over late Friday afternoon, indicating that the lead of an Islamist attack was privileged after the attack on the Paris police prefecture. The flagrante delicto investigation opened by the Paris Public Prosecutor's Office was reintroduced as
an assassination of a person in possession of public authority in connection with a terrorist enterprise, an attempted assassination of a person in possession of public authority in connection with a terrorist enterprise and a criminal terrorist criminal association. Investigations are carried out by the Counter-Terrorism Section of the Criminal Brigade, the Central Directorate of the Judicial Police and the General Directorate of Internal Security, the lead agency in the fight against terrorism.
After the police and gendarmes murdered between 2015 and 2018 and after many failed attack projects, the police were hit once again. But this time at the very heart of the Paris Police Prefecture, one of the symbols of the State, and by an official who has been working there for many years, within one of the most sensitive intelligence services, the Direction du Renseignement de la Préfecture de Police de Paris (DRPP). [ Intelligense Service ] On Friday, the Paris police prefect, Didier Lallement, addressed his people by saying: "This tragedy is all the more terrible because it occurred inside the Prefecture and because it was carried by one of us."
The profile of the assailant, Mickaël Harpon, 45 years of age, administrative agent at the DRPP, is of course at the heart of the investigation. As early as Thursday, a number of factors were supporting the terrorist hypothesis. The premeditation was not consistent with a delirious outburst.
And the use by the assailant of a knife with a long ceramic blade to bypass the protective gates of the Prefecture was even more worrying. Last March, the wife of terrorist Michael Chiolo had brought such a weapon into Condé-sur-Sarthe prison and the couple had wounded two supervisors.
We also realized that Mickaël Harpon, whose clothing or behaviour did not betray adherence to radical Islam, was attending a mosque in Gonesse, one of whose imams is known for his misadventures in the nearby town of Sarcelles. The religious reportedly invited Salafists to come and pray before being the target of a "revolt" by the "elders" and pushed towards the exit.
The man, who was the target of an unenforced deportation measure, failed at Gonesse. Could Mickaël Harpon have been influenced by militant Islamists? Third and lastly, the night before the crime, a neighbour of Mickaël Harpon's police officer was woken up, at around 3 or 4 in the morning, by a "Allah akbar" coming from his apartment. The man went back to sleep but made the connection with the drama the next day. He was heard by the investigators.
In the course of an investigation that progressed extremely quickly, two elements finally turned things around: the examination of the alleged terrorist's mobile phone and computer equipment and the statements of his relatives, including his wife, whose police custody was extended on Friday evening. Two elements indicating that the person concerned had switched to radicalism.
The charges also suggest that Mickaël Harpon may have benefited from complicity or established contact with a terrorist group.
The opening of a terrorist investigation will in any case provide investigators with a series of technical and legal means to investigate these leads. Thursday's tragedy is all the more chilling as Mickaël Harpon has escaped all vigilance. On Thursday, Interior Minister Christophe Castaner said that the attacker had "never presented any behavioural difficulties (and) never showed any warning signs". Needless to say, the criminal record of this man entitled to secrecy was clean. His trail on social networks showed an adherence to a rigid Islam but not to jihadist terrorism.
The search of his home did not reveal any material elements incriminating (weapons, explosives, wills, texts, radical works, flag of the Islamic State...). An attack on one of the French police sanctuaries naturally revives the debate on radicalisation in public services and on the infiltration of Islamists into the heart of the state.
BBM