The good time-work time amount really is up to the sheriff. That is why he has created tiered levels, with 10% being typical time served for low level offenders all the way up to the 100 % time served for more violent offenders.The "good time" credits are federally mandated - to ease overcrowding and encourage good behavior. At this time for jails it's each 4 days served = 6 days credit. Same thing with the "check-in" credit for the exact days starting at midnight. Basically if you are "in custody" at midnight you get credited for that entire day - even if you are actually there only 30 minutes of that "day". Prison sentences are mandated by the same type of "rules" - not sure if it's the 4=6 for prison though?
Prisoners (jail or prison) can also "work" and they earn "extra time off credit" for working as well. This IS discretionary. Paris cannot "work" to earn additional credit (per the judge) but the judge cannot prohibit her from getting the federally mandated "good time" credit. "Good Time" is NOT discretionary - no judge can change that. Paris also gets credit for any "days" she spent in jail prior.
Thus a 45 day sentence gets reduced to 23 (or fewer) days for Paris and ANY prisoner who is reasonably well behaved. Other prisoners who are eligible to WORK also get additional "time served" credits - reducing THEIR sentences even further. It is not the Sheriff OR the judge who sets the "good time" rules and Paris is not getting any special treatment.
And BTW - Michelle Rodriguez spent 2 days in the same jail for a DUI probation violation - and the second arrest she was on probation, her license was suspended and she WAS DRUNK - Paris was not. And MR WAS admitted to the special needs cell block (same as Paris), not into the general population. ALL celebrities are automatically "special needs" - it isn't their choice - it's because they cannot be properly protected from angry, violent, ill or disturbed inmates who might be in the general population. They become a target just by being there and the jail does NOT want a Mel Gibson or Michelle Rodgriguez or Paris Hilton to get injured (or killed) or get a staph infection or other disease while in their custody..it works the same everywhere - even Martha Stewart went into a special cell block with inmates who could be trusted.
My Opinion
There are really just standards. her in the OC, it is 30% reduction across the board for most offenders in jail, just the good time/work time program that is in effect and works down here. Inmates can work and/or behave well for the same amount of credit..30%.
This is the frustration and political part of this argument. the judge hands down a sentence, but the sheriff can apply the good time credits at his discretion due to overcrowding in CA jails, with LA jails being among the worst. The judges are frustrated that the sheriff can reduce the sentences, but the sheriff can do that based on overcrowding. The Judges do not like it.
The difference in PH's case was that the judge specifically forbade certain things that are avilable to other probation violaters, which is part of the debate.She was only able to get 50% good time work time credits, where any regular Joe would have been eligible for 90% reduction and release after 4 or 5 days.While the sheriff has the latitude to release low level offenders after they have served 10% of their sentence. he could not do that in this case, when normally he can.That is why he felt he had the power to do it and the judge said not in this case.
These are 2 powerful factions in a power struggle.