You have said many times that the 3 page ransom note wouldn't have come from the Ramseys because every word they wrote was one more piece of evidence against them. Would not this same line of thinking apply to your supposed intruder? If he was so "forensically aware", why the long note? In fact, I'll argue the need for any note whatsoever if she was taken by an intruder. Why not just call early the next morning and say "we have your daughter"? The note is simply an unnecessary bit of incriminating evidence, redundant by the fact that the supposed kidnappers would need to call the next morning anyway.
andreww,
BBM: Absolutely 100%, something I've mentioned many times before. I rarely consider the ransom note since I regard it as staged forensic evidence.
Why does the RN point to the R's, simply because they assumed they had no other option, i.e. they could not phone themselves to announce an abduction at say 2:00 AM. So the RN was part of a calculated plan, e.g. no fingerprints on the RN, or on the flashlight, how so?
The R's staged a crime-scene in the basement, hoping to mess up enough of the evidence, so to avoid immediate arrest?
The R's plan largely succeeded once BR was relocated out of the house. The R's game plan appeared to be: hide all the forensic evidence in the basement including the wine-cellar, hope that nothing was found and fly interstate out of Colorado ASAP!
Parts of the plan worked, others did not, so JR improvised and
found JonBenet, something he could have done prior to BR being relocated.
So the R's were forensically aware where it mattered, they likely knew written text is ambiguous as direct evidence, that fiber evidence was similarly not conclusive, since they lived in the same house, yet IDI usually fail to mention, as Kolar has, how come a Foreign Faction enters a house kidnaps, sexually assaults, asphyxiates and applies blunt force to a childs skull without leaving any forensic evidence at any of the evidential locations, separated by time and space?
No abductor is going to sit in the abductee's house and draft copies of a RN, even semi-illiterate abductors do not do this, drafting is the work of a professional attempting to
get it right by varying the tone and phrasing.
No abductor is going to waste time sitting around to see if the abductee is really dead, that whack on the head never worked,
Oh I better use my garrote technique just to make sure. Then for some reason the abductor thinks:
I took all these risks, entering the house, removing JonBenet from her bed, assaulting her, then killing her, you know what I'll just leave her in the wine-cellar, but I better clean her up, redress her in her day clothes plus some clean size-12's and longjonhns first.
No way, the R's were covering up for another family member. More than likely the one not indicted by the GJ?
.
