elainebenice
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2008
- Messages
- 359
- Reaction score
- 680
About the whole "extortion" thing- how could either Joran or the Holloways trust the other in such a scheme? Would Joran really have been clueless enough to think that his arch enemy, who publicly suspected him of causing her daughter's death over and over again, was going to pay him $250,000? Did he really think they had that kind of money? As for Beth, how could she have thought this habitual liar was going to finally tell her where the body was? That's why, it had to originate on the Twitty/Holloway side- that's the way stings always work.
Again, I find the timing most peculiar. The payoff of $15,000 (or was it $10,000- again, conflicting accounts) allegedly took place on May 10. Even some mainstream "journalists" have questioned the obvious oddity of the FBI not busting Joran on the spot, as they invariably do in normal stings. At any rate, almost immediately after this, Joran decides, inexplicably in my view, to go to Peru. Why Peru? What was the attraction there? If he had a lot of cash suddenly, aren't there many far more attractive places to go gamble than this small Third World nation?
I admit I don't know all the nuances in such a conspiracy, but I simply can't accept all these "coincidences." I think that's why so many conspiracies are successful; people are trained, by their teachers, politicians and media, to instantly dismiss such notions. And, by their nature, there are secrets associated with them that none of us, even those most receptive to such theories, can easily surmise.
ok, I appreciate a different opinion on any issue, if for no other reason than the fact I enjoy debating pretty much any subject and you have presented some opinions/theories that I simply can't resist commenting on....
In response to your comments/questions I have bolded in the above post - A) Whether you want to consider it clueless, desperate, or narcissistic the answer to your 1st question is an absolute - YES, he would have been. We are talking about the same person who has told countless versions of the circumstances surrounding NH's disappearance/death and is repeating this same pattern now that he has been caught (or set up if you prefer) in another similar situation. I can only assume that he believed, or at least hoped, each individual he was telling these various versions to actually believed what he was saying, even though it became clear after version 10000 that he was just saying whatever he thought the particular person wanted to hear or he needed to say at that particular time. I've personally known people like this (who haven't killed anyone, at least as far as I know) and I simply describe them all as LIARS. Each and every person I have ever known who has exhibited a chronic problem with telling the truth ALL share at least 1 thing - they have convinced themselves in their own mind that what they are saying is the truth. This allows them to lie with confidence, b/c afterall, what they are saying isn't really a "lie." This false sense of confidence spills over into their perception of how the lies are received by the people they are telling them to, which results in the liar really believing that the other person is actually buying whatever line of BS it is they are trying to sell. When you combine this personality trait with a sense of desperation, such as the sense you would have when you have gambled away your last penny and still need to eat/live, then you end up with a person who can believe things such as - that his arch enemy, who publicly suspected him of causing her daughter's death over and over again, was going to pay him $250,000?
B) I'm not sure if I would call what Beth did as much a "belief" that Joran would tell her where NH's body was, so much as I would call it a "hope" and a desperate hope at that. The kind of desperation that I believe only the parent of a missing child can truly understand. Thankfully, I don't understand the actual depths of this desperation, but I can only imagine it would lead someone to do almost anything if they thought it presented even the slightest chance of getting an answer to a question that has haunted them since the day part of themselves was taken away from them without any warning or explanation.
C) I'm not aware of a textbook definition or procedure that "stings" follow, but I do know that it "takes 2 to tango" and whether JVS contacted NH's family for money in exchange for information or vice versa, the bottom line is - JVS accepted money with the understanding that it was in exchange for him providing information that would ultimately tie him to a much more serious crime than extortion. No one forced him to provide the FBI, Beth or anyone else his location or bank account information. If he was actually contacted by them, he could have easily declined the offer with the explanation that he wasn't involved, therefore he couldn't provide the information they were seeking. That would have put a quick end to the colossal "sting" operation and therefore an end to whatever "plans" NH's family and the FBI may have had going forward as well. You seem to be proposing that the "sting" had an orchestrated grand finale that was scheduled to take place in Peru, just as it ultimately did. I obviously don't give the FBI or Beth enough credit as the amazing puppet masters they must actually be in order to pull off such a unbelievable global operation that managed to coordinate the movements and actions of such a gigantic, unconnected casts of characters. I guess I have the same exact question for you - Why Peru?