I understand what you're saying, but the bigger question, for me at least, is if those who are 100% certain Joran is a murderer oppose the authorities-of any country-coercing an involuntary "confession" from a suspect by using his lack of fluency in the native language against him.
I don't believe that the authorities, anywhere, should be able to type up a false "confession" and then lie about what it says ("You're just saying that you understand your rights," etc.), in order to make it appear that a suspect is admitting guilt.
I realize that Joran has little credibility, and those who have already convicted him of this crime will simply believe this is typical behavior for him- lying once again. However, if he signed a paper and the authorities lied to him about what was written on it, isn't that terribly wrong to do?