justthinkin
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2008
- Messages
- 2,223
- Reaction score
- 176
The main problem I see, Unreals, is that your suppositions fly in the face of overwhelming amounts of evidence to the contrary. There are other threads where we debate back and forth as to whether we think someone is guilty or not. But, this is just so incredibly obvious. There is no conspiracy on earth that would set up a young girl to be killed, so that Joran could be bagged. I just don't believe that is possible. Further, were he innocent of even the Natalee case, he wouldn't have done so many things to make himself look guilty. That defies common sense. Innocent people do not behave as Joran has behaved for the last five years.
To add to Belinda's post, throughout all of this SF case, the only time that JVDS has ever once looked like a deer caught in the headlights, is the very moment he spotted that camera in the hallway. Oh he was framed alright, mouth open and slack-jawed, front and center in a gotcha kind of way.
There are people framed every day, but the odds JVDS has truly been framed have to be something like a million to one. JMHO. Any bookies out there?