Peterson's Murder Trial May Move From Will County

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Paintr said:
Since this trial will be about the death of Kathleen, I wonder if the jury will ever hear about the fact that Stacy is missing. I believe the SA will only be allowed to bring forth evidence regarding Kathleen's death. Since Mr Peterson has not been charged for Stacy's death, I think nothing pertaining to Stacy will be allowed. Maybe someone with more legal knowledge can correct me if I have it wrong. :)
Click to expand...

You probably have more legal knowledge than I do, Paintr, but I think you are correct. :) I don't think it can be used as a pattern of abuse. Would the fact Stacy's disappearance happened afterward also play a role in admissibility?:confused:
 
Paintr said:
Since this trial will be about the death of Kathleen, I wonder if the jury will ever hear about the fact that Stacy is missing. I believe the SA will only be allowed to bring forth evidence regarding Kathleen's death. Since Mr Peterson has not been charged for Stacy's death, I think nothing pertaining to Stacy will be allowed. Maybe someone with more legal knowledge can correct me if I have it wrong. :)
Click to expand...

Wouldn't Stacy come into this trial if the hearsay law is used? ie. what Stacy told her pastor about Drew admitting to killing Kathleen.
 
I say, bring it to McHenry County. And I hope I am called.
 
Paintr said:
Since this trial will be about the death of Kathleen, I wonder if the jury will ever hear about the fact that Stacy is missing. I believe the SA will only be allowed to bring forth evidence regarding Kathleen's death. Since Mr Peterson has not been charged for Stacy's death, I think nothing pertaining to Stacy will be allowed. Maybe someone with more legal knowledge can correct me if I have it wrong. :)
Click to expand...

It is unlikely that anything about Stacy will be admitted into this trial. Even if he had been charged with Stacy's murder that is different than a conviction, and prior records are generally only admissable during the penalty phase.

They could possibly call Stacy's pastor under the hearsay law, indicating only that he was the pastor of Drew's next wife, but in this trial or in Stacy's I think they will avoid using this type of testimony if at all possible. This is a new law, unused and untested by any cases that have used it being appealed and upheld. They are not going to want this high of a profile case being overturned so I would expect that they will not use it unless they absolutely need it.
 
Brodsky needs to convince his client to confess and take a plea. Save the state money and the families further pain.
Every time the media shows the clip of him in his orange j/suit talking to the inmates as he enters the jail house, I want to slap him sane.
If moving the case will lessen the event of a mistrial or some other nonsense, I guess it will be ok.
 
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/lo

The defense team filed a motion last month for a change of venue due to the massive media coverage the case is attracting. Earlier this week, Drew Peterson's attorneys filed a 29-page motion to have the new Illinois hearsay law - nicknamed "Drew's Law" - declared unconstitutional. Defense attorneys say the state statute cannot be used against Drew Peterson because it was passed four years after the events he is accused of.
"The criminal law cannot relate back. It cannot change the rules of evidence in the middle of the game, so to speak," said Joel Brodsky, Drew Peterson's attorney.
 
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/foxvalleysun/news/1716632,Peterson-hearing_jo081409.article

Peterson hearing halted for potential jurors

An expected hearing on a motion for a change of venue in the Drew Peterson case was delayed this morning when the judge told the courtroom he planned to bring some 240 potential jurors into the courtroom.

.....


Jurors also will be given a questionnaire that among other things lists some 493 potential witnesses in the case. Potential jurors will be asked to indicate if they have any connection with them.

All reporters were then ordered out of the courtroom.
 
http://www.kwqc.com/Global/story.asp?S=10931313

The judge assigned to Drew Peterson's murder trial is asking potential Will County jurors to fill out questionnaires even though the former police officer wants his trial moved.

Judge Stephen White on Friday said he'll have 240 people fill out the questionnaire - the first step in jury selection - although no trial date has been set.

...

White says he's proceeding under the assumption the trial will be in Will County. He says he's trying to protect a jury pool by warning them not to read or listen to reports about the case.
 
Paintr said:
http://www.kwqc.com/Global/story.asp?S=10931313

The judge assigned to Drew Peterson's murder trial is asking potential Will County jurors to fill out questionnaires even though the former police officer wants his trial moved.

Judge Stephen White on Friday said he'll have 240 people fill out the questionnaire - the first step in jury selection - although no trial date has been set.

...

White says he's proceeding under the assumption the trial will be in Will County. He says he's trying to protect a jury pool by warning them not to read or listen to reports about the case.
Click to expand...

oooh oooh pick me! pick me!
 
http://cbs2chicago.com/wireapnewsil/Peterson.judge.to.2.1128128.html

The judge assigned to Drew Peterson's murder trial is asking potential Will County jurors to fill out questionnaires even though the former police officer wants his trial moved.

I wonder what Mr Brodsky's reaction to this will be? Maybe it will turn out good for his client if the answers on the questionares indicate that the trial should be moved.:waitasec:
 
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,539520,00.html

Illinois Murder Suspects Drew Peterson and Greg Long Say Cases Flawed Because of Same Coroner

Long and Peterson are both behind bars fighting murder charges. And the lives of both suspects could come down to what one man, forensic pathologist Dr. Bryan R. Mitchell, had to say. Long believes the connection is so significant that he pleaded for help after realizing the coincidence.
 
http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/The-Drews-and-Drew-Nots-of-Petersons-Trial-53238202.html

The Drews and Drew Nots of Peterson's Trial


The judge advised the pool he had no plans to sequester Peterson's jury, and had no intention of holding a trial, which would last many months.

Peterson arrived from the jail shackled, wearing a gray pinstriped suit, but the shackles were removed before potential jurors entered the courtroom. When he was introduced, Peterson smiled and said, "Good day folks, how are you?"

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=8330124

White also set an Oct. 2 hearing on a motion filed by Peterson's attorneys challenging the constitutionality of a hearsay law passed in Illinois in 2008 and widely viewed as a response to the case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Staff online

Members online

... and 145 more.
Total: 1,745 (members: 146, guests: 1,599)

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
1,599
Total visitors
1,745
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
606,812
Messages
18,211,581
Members
233,968
Latest member
Bill1620
Back
Top