First of all, and I'd like to get this over with as soon as possible: In my above post filled with statistics, I omitted the words "per year" every single time I should have used them. I should never post after midnight. Just insert "per year" at the end of every sentence, and that will about fix it.
Here's a quotation from WGN found in a very informative discussion of breed bans:
http://wgnradio.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31802&Itemid=394
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]It turns out that pit bulls are, in fact, absolutely the same as all dogs, argues Dr. Karen Overall, a veterinary behaviorist and researcher in the psychiatry department at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, who bases her view on research she and others have conducted. Whats more, this summer the Supreme Court of Alabama ruled there is no genetic evidence identifying pit bulls as inherently more dangerous than other dogs. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]According to recent testing of 122 dog breeds by the American Temperament Testing Society, pit bulls achieved a passing rate 83.9 per cent of the time. Golden retrievers ranked 83.2 per cent, beagles at 78.2 per cent, and standard schnauzers, a surprisingly low 63.5 per cent.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]The truth is that pit bulls were indeed bred (using mostly various bull terrier breeds) to fight other dogs. Its true that some pit bulls are genetically hard wired to be dog aggressive, but that has nothing whatsoever to do with being aggressive to people, Beaver says.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]The related Staffordshire bull terrier and American Staffordshire terrier are legendary family dogs, the former dubbed the nanny dog for their devotion to children. Hedges says pit bulls were developed for dog fighting, but that also requires them not to turn on their people. She says, Im constantly surprised that even pit bulls abused by people have an amazing threshold for unconditional forgiveness.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]I do think requiring muzzles in public on any large, powerful dog or dog-aggressive dog is a good idea. I think all dogs should be leashed in public and fenced (not tied up) when in their owners' yards. And I don't think dog-aggressive dogs should run free in a dog park nor that dog-aggressive dogs should live in the same household with other dogs. And I don't think small children should be left alone with any dog, for both of their sakes.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]However, from my own experience, I have never known a pit bull that has acted aggressively to its family or their friends or to strangers on the street. That's more than I can say for some chows, German shepherds, Scotties, golden retrievers, Irish setters and beagels I have known. (Yes, I'm looking at you, Huntley.)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]
[/FONT]