SadlyMistaken
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 352
- Reaction score
- 0
I may be COMPLETELY off here but after reading the SW. I thought that the detective was trying to say that after DG started getting questioned about Lindsey's disappearance.. he started hanging out with the neighbor every night.. that had the problems with memory that was due to drug and alcohol abuse.. in an attempt to create an alibi for June 26th. That the neighbor with the memory problems, when questioned did say that DG was at the BBQ that night and that he was with a girl. Then when they talked to the girl. She said that she was there but that DG wasn't there... and she agreed to be interviewed. I guess I will have to read it again. I just don't get why they would add the info about the person with the memory problem and the girl's answer and that she agreed to be interviewed if they weren't trying to establish that he had told several difference stories about where he was that night, that were all untrue. That he even tried to manipulate someone with mental problems to lie for him.
OK.. now that I read it again.. it says "investigators believed she had been......." . I am thinking "at home".. maybe?.. which if this was Stephani.. would have been in eastern WA. Guess that makes more sense. The guy with the mental problems said they were there together.. but she couldn't have been there because she wasn't even in town and her and DG had just begun talking that day. LOL I don't know.. that whole part is confusing to me.