Myspace recently updated and each user had to either upgrade or their pge would go inactive. All of the early post, images, comments are not visible unless the user upgraded. Even then, all the comments seem to be gone
Here is a link to the picture you are refering to, however this is a full picture iclusive her head and I´m 99.99% sure it IS the right Natasha Jugo :
https://myspace.com/221074976/mixes/profilemix-60003/photo/1381784
Myspace recently updated and each user had to either upgrade or their pge would go inactive. All of the early post, images, comments are not visible unless the user upgraded. Even then, all the comments seem to be gone
Yes this is the picture I was talking about, Unfortunately I still can't see her head. If you are able to see the full picture is there anyway you can copy it and post it. I would be interested to see it and compare against the only photo put out by the media (Which is another curious thing - why no other photo's)
Looks similar but not exactly. JMO
The date reflects the day her body washed up at the beach. The death is recorded as the day the body found not the day the person went missing.
She washed ashore fours days after the date in the obit.
I read through every post since NJ was first reported missing and I still think, by saying this is not related, when after three months there is still no official autopsy report, LE is trying to bait the killer/killers. IMO, her washing up intact, no animal activity after three months in the ocean, wearing only a bra and right in between Hemlock Cove and West Gilgo are just a few of the reasons I still believe NJ's death is related to GB4.
Here is the full picture:
And here a picture of Natasha Jugo to compare:
Personaly, I have no doubt whatsoever, the photo of the girl in black outfit
IS indeed natash Jugo.
Rossmo's formula (aka Jeopardy Surfaces) could potentially work. We have quite a bit of data. For example, where they were last seen, and where they were found, for at least 7 of the 11 victims. Also, in the case of JT and Jane Doe of Manorville you have 2 additional points, as their remains were dumped in two different places. So, that is 10 data points covering two crime scenes for each of the GB 4 & SG (abduction, dump site). And 6 covering JT & Jane Doe. You also have the cell pings from Melissa's phone. Can't recall how many. But am pretty sure you're looking at more than 6 additional data points.Rossmo appears to use crime scene locations, but all we have are the locations of the remains (and/or the "general" place the victim was last seen)... would the formula still work?
Rossmo's formula (aka Jeopardy Surfaces) could potentially work. We have quite a bit of data. For example, where they were last seen, and where they were found, for at least 7 of the 11 victims. Also, in the case of JT and Jane Doe of Manorville you have 2 additional points, as their remains were dumped in two different places. So, that is 10 data points covering two crime scenes for each of the GB 4 & SG (abduction, dump site). And 6 covering JT & Jane Doe. You also have the cell pings from Melissa's phone. Can't recall how many. But am pretty sure you're looking at more than 6 additional data points.
We also have someone trying to access Maureen's voicemail several months after she disappeared. Where this ping occurred is somewhat unclear...some reports say near Fire Island, others say Fire Island.
Was this reported to LE? And if so, why weren't they able to determine the number from which the calls were being made in attempts to access the VM? And who were the reports of the pings from indicating in or near FI?