Having been in media relations for years, I am fully aware that people lie to journalists and journalists also lie to the public. Thats pretty common knowledge. Kolker provided a story that makes sense on why a felon driver of a prostitute may say to himself "I have no desire to talk with cops about Shannan -- I have no desire to play cat and mouse with Shannan -- this is ridiculous -- I'm leaving."
By the same token, and speaking of agendas to deceive, if you are not aware, there is behind-the-scenes lobbying effort by someone to spread unverified information about Pak. I know this for certain. This person has a reckless disregard for the truth and I dont appreciate it. Im not saying you know about this at all Im just explaining why I push-back hard on any unsubstantiated claims about Pak or anyone who presumes to know exactly what happened between him and Shannan since Pak was cleared by LE years ago. So if theres new inside information on Pak or knowledge of his and Shannans relationship that has not been reported by bona fide sources then WS has a verification process for insiders.
Thanks for the response Neptune, I am not aware of the behind the scenes lobbying to spread unverified information about Pak. However you do use the phrase "since Pak was cleared by LE years ago". How and for what crime(s) was Pak cleared? Of course Pak has not been charged with any offense relating to the Oak Beach, but neither has anybody else for that matter.
Being 'cleared' only means they were not charged at that time, new evidence may always turn up, that can change the course of any investigation. The history of cold cases is filled with individuals being interviewed and released during the initial investigation and then charged years later when new evidence is discovered.
I am not accusing MP of anything, I just feel he knows more, and is more involved than he has admitted. I also believe his knowledge especially about his relationship with Brewer, other women in the sex trade and who he saw in Brewer's house that morning would be of great assistance to LE.
Quite possibly MP has not commented because he feels saying too much might be unhealthy.
By the way, Pak has never publicly explained why he did leave Oak Beach that morning, why he did not continue to search for Shannan, why he did not assist the Police Officer in the search at that morning. Imagine if he had meet with the officer, told the officer where he last saw Shannan running, assisted in looking in the swamp in daylight, chances are Shannan would have been found alive that morning.
By the same token, and speaking of agendas to deceive, if you are not aware, there is behind-the-scenes lobbying effort by someone to spread unverified information about Pak. I know this for certain. This person has a reckless disregard for the truth and I dont appreciate it. Im not saying you know about this at all Im just explaining why I push-back hard on any unsubstantiated claims about Pak or anyone who presumes to know exactly what happened between him and Shannan since Pak was cleared by LE years ago. So if theres new inside information on Pak or knowledge of his and Shannans relationship that has not been reported by bona fide sources then WS has a verification process for insiders.
Thanks for the response Neptune, I am not aware of the behind the scenes lobbying to spread unverified information about Pak. However you do use the phrase "since Pak was cleared by LE years ago". How and for what crime(s) was Pak cleared? Of course Pak has not been charged with any offense relating to the Oak Beach, but neither has anybody else for that matter.
Being 'cleared' only means they were not charged at that time, new evidence may always turn up, that can change the course of any investigation. The history of cold cases is filled with individuals being interviewed and released during the initial investigation and then charged years later when new evidence is discovered.
I am not accusing MP of anything, I just feel he knows more, and is more involved than he has admitted. I also believe his knowledge especially about his relationship with Brewer, other women in the sex trade and who he saw in Brewer's house that morning would be of great assistance to LE.
Quite possibly MP has not commented because he feels saying too much might be unhealthy.
By the way, Pak has never publicly explained why he did leave Oak Beach that morning, why he did not continue to search for Shannan, why he did not assist the Police Officer in the search at that morning. Imagine if he had meet with the officer, told the officer where he last saw Shannan running, assisted in looking in the swamp in daylight, chances are Shannan would have been found alive that morning.