Post Verdict -Working Out The Unresolved Questions

[LindaFaye]

I read Jan 3 JA Does anyone know what will be going on today ?
I also read the trail want start until med Feb Does anyone have any more updates

 

[Ricki]

I read Jan 3 JA Does anyone know what will be going on today ?
I also read the trail want start until med Feb Does anyone have any more updates

No updates yet. None on Wild about Trial twitter, but I did find this on her twitter page. Unbelievable.
Jodi Arias ‏@JodiAnnArias 13h

They read <modsnip> and "Free Jodi." The proceeds go into the appellate fund.
Expand



Jodi Arias &#8207;@JodiAnnArias 13h

To raise funds for appellate costs, wristbands (or "Jodibands," as many people are calling them) are being <modsnip>

 

[janx]

No updates yet. None on Wild about Trial twitter, but I did find this on her twitter page. Unbelievable.
Jodi Arias &#8207;@JodiAnnArias 13h

They read <modsnip> and "Free Jodi." The proceeds go into the appellate fund.
Expand



Jodi Arias &#8207;@JodiAnnArias 13h

To raise funds for appellate costs, wristbands (or "Jodibands," as many people are calling them) are being <modsnip>

Very funny. How many people are actually going to buy those things? 25? 50?

I also love how "many people" are calling them something when this is the first mention of them...:floorlaugh:

 

[Ricki]

I don't know where to get tweets from but I found this one from Kiefer.

Michael Kiefer &#8207;@michaelbkiefer 20m

Jodi Arias is in court at 2:30 MST. Will Judge Stephens let us in today?

 

[Truth Detector]

I must have missed that testimony and I could have. There were days I just could not watch her on the stand. For some reason I thought she was still living in the home up until the time she decided to move to Mesa.

I have to say, too, is it possible we only have JA's word that they were dating exclusively. Was there anything ever from TA's side that claimed they were a couple? It seems to me in her relationships she is the determining factor as to whether or not they are an exclusive item. And if the male partner is not on the same page as she is his freedom to date anyone he chooses is considered by JA as "cheating". jmo

BBM

Well, to be fair -- not like the lying torture murderess was ever fair, especially to her victim -- there was a reason that, by their own statements, Chris and Skye Hughes didn't want TA with JA. So they either perceived them as a "couple" or at least a "potential couple", since JA/TA 'overnighted' at the Hughes place when/where those concerns were discussed. I view Chris and Skye Hughes, at this point anyway, as representing to the best of their abilities TA's side.

 

[LambChop]

BBM

Well, to be fair -- not like the lying torture murderess was ever fair, especially to her victim -- there was a reason that, by their own statements, Chris and Skye Hughes didn't want TA with JA. So they either perceived them as a "couple" or at least a "potential couple", since JA/TA 'overnighted' at the Hughes place when/where those concerns were discussed. I view Chris and Skye Hughes, at this point anyway, as representing to the best of their abilities TA's side.

Yes, that is true the Hughes did first think that JA was marriage material but that changed pretty quickly when SH found out JA had lied to her. JA is a manipulator and apparently until you catch her in a lie most people were inclined to believe her. At the time Sky tried to convince TA JA was right for him because he was dating others, too. JA managed to stay overnight in many homes where she was not necessarily expected. Such as being told to leave Sky's home and JA refusing. Sleeping under the Christmas tree when she was politely told she had to leave because there was no place for her to sleep.

So that is what I'm thinking. Was there really ever a time they were "going together" since she wasn't even living in the same state as TA during their "exclusiveness". I don't believe she received candy on Valentine's Day from Travis in the form of mini candy bars you can buy at Walmart that were left sitting on her front steps. That never seemed to be Travis' style. I also do not believe he sent her the shirt or the underwear. When someone does something like that to mark an important occasion don't we all keep the handwritten note that he would have written? He excelled at writing. He was a busy man involved in his business at the time and I don't see him sitting down ironing letters onto a shirt and panties. I see him going somewhere to buy something, like Victoria Secrets. He could have done it but I find it more believable that Jodi did it. And I believe they were done to prove to other's that they were, in fact, dating exclusively and that he was cheating on her. jmo

 

[Ricki]

Michael Kiefer &#8207;@michaelbkiefer 4m

Once again, stranded in the hallway outside the Jodi Arias courtroom as the lawyers and the judge tell secrets. It's getting old.

 

[LambChop]

Anyone remember if there was anything written in JA's journals about receiving the shirt, panties and candy on Valentine's Day?

 

[Truth Detector]

 

[Truth Detector]

Anyone remember if there was anything written in JA's journals about receiving the shirt, panties and candy on Valentine's Day?

It wouldn't surprise me at all, because I believe she penned most of the entries post facto in her efforts to fabricate a defense.

 

[Ricki]

Oh my. Is it over already.


Tweets All / No replies

Michael Kiefer &#8207;@michaelbkiefer 6m

No news in the Jodi Arias hearing. Jennifer Willmott and Juan Martinez left without comment.

 

[Truth Detector]

Asked Kiefer if he saw who was present.

His reply:

Now we'll have to watch for the minutes or the leak, whichever comes first.

 

[Ricki]

I just read on the St vs Jodi Arias FB that the next court date is Jan 13

and this from WATS

Tweets

Wild About Trial &#8207;@WildAboutTrial 1m

No news of what went on in the hearing. Another hearing on Jan 13. I am getting used to this. #JodiArias

 

[Ricki]

Hmm, this could be interesting.

Mike Zarantonello &#8207;@SouthmoorRd 11m

@WildAboutTrial observers said Kurt and Jen were pissed when they left........

 

[Ricki]

And from Juans support page.

THE HEARING HAS ENDED. JANUARY 13TH ORAL ARGUMENTS WILL BE HEARD. PER THE TRIAL DIVAS, JUAN LOOKED HAPPY COMING OUT OF THE COURTROOM. NURMI NOT SOO CHIPPER!!

 

[Truth Detector]

Hmm, this could be interesting.

Mike Zarantonello &#8207;@SouthmoorRd 11m

@WildAboutTrial observers said Kurt and Jen were pissed when they left........

If Steven Alexander speaks for the rest of the victim's family, they continue to maintain that LWOP would be a perversion of justice.

I don't get a vote, but I concur.

 

[Angelina Frost]

And from Juans support page.

THE HEARING HAS ENDED. JANUARY 13TH ORAL ARGUMENTS WILL BE HEARD. PER THE TRIAL DIVAS, JUAN LOOKED HAPPY COMING OUT OF THE COURTROOM. NURMI NOT SOO CHIPPER!!

It's about time the State has something to smile about. The delay in sentencing this convicted murderer has been embarrassing beyond belief.

I still worry about the end game though and how the family might react. Twelve people coming to a DP consensus seems like a long shot.

Look no further than the former foreman who drank JA's kool-aid. :facepalm:

 

[janx]

Oral arguments about what? What on earth is there left to discuss?

 

[gcharlie]

Anyone remember if there was anything written in JA's journals about receiving the shirt, panties and candy on Valentine's Day?

I don't recall seeing a journal entry, however there was an email shown as evidence in court that was sent by CMJA around 5 pm on Valentine's Day with no mention of any Valentine's gifts. Martinez brought it to the jury's attention that she did not bring any of these supposed gifts up in her email.

IIRC this email is the one where she was trying to console him about his anger and talked about her own, including the kicking in of doors?

 

[gcharlie]

I was disappointed to hear that a trial date was not scheduled today.

This whole trial and all of the side stuff has dragged on for so long. I can't imagine being a family member going through all of this.

I have to keep reminding myself that she has been convicted of M1 and the only thing ahead of her is a transfer to Perryville. She and her supporters can kid themselves all they like that she will succeed on appeal, but it ain't gonna happen. The evidence was just too strong...the only possible issue that I can see holding any sway with an appeal court would be juror misconduct. That has to be proven, not alleged, and so far nothing has come up.

RIP Travis.