Then don't look at it.:Bananasnap:
that's the problem , it's impossible not to look at it , it's just there!:twocents:
Then don't look at it.:Bananasnap:
At the risk of sounding like a jerk, could we get back to subject, please?
I didn't vote in this poll because even tho I lean towards accident covered up, there are parts of me that think there MAY have been premeditation.
Do you mean premeditated by John or Patsy? Could you expand on that? I haven't heard too many RDI theories involving first-degree murder, so I am very interested. Someone actually posted a list on this forum a while back about why they thought JBR's murder was premeditated...it was very intriguing...I should find it and post it here.
Here's the post about JBR's murder being premeditated:
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Perhaps she did it for JonBenet
Hey, you and Fair-whatever couldn't resist making two posts about my sig. YOU two need to get back on track.
Oi , " Fair-whatever" , now who is sounding like a jerk, I just told you like it is , you want to ignore it , that's up to you.
Although, after reading at this link, I wouldn't doubt the evilness in that family, and pre-meditated murder may have been the way it went.
RDI Theorists - Page 7 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
:cow: JMO
I don't think anyone intended to kill the girl, but that doesn't mean the acts of violence against her aren't criminal. Those crimes and her murder demand punishment and justice, and yes, *I* would consider it first degree murder. The person or persons who murdered the child are criminals and so are anyone who helped cover for him/her/them. The most vile of criminals, imo.
I'm sure the poor little girl was horrifically abused all her life and there should have been equal justice for that. No telling what she endured. Not to mention being horribly paraded in front of people so she could be judged by slimy judges and spectators. :maddening:
I can't begin to imagine what was done to her in her short life. For shame to her parents who only thought of themselves. :furious:
Sadly there will never be justice for JonBenet.
Although, after reading at this link, I wouldn't doubt the evilness in that family, and pre-meditated murder may have been the way it went.
RDI Theorists - Page 7 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
:cow: JMO
P.S. - Alix, I think your signature is hilarious. :blushing:
I don't think anyone intended to kill the girl, but that doesn't mean the acts of violence against her aren't criminal. Those crimes and her murder demand punishment and justice, and yes, *I* would consider it first degree murder. The person or persons who murdered the child are criminals and so are anyone who helped cover for him/her/them. The most vile of criminals, imo.
I'm sure the poor little girl was horrifically abused all her life and there should have been equal justice for that. No telling what she endured. Not to mention being horribly paraded in front of people so she could be judged by slimy judges and spectators. :maddening:
I can't begin to imagine what was done to her in her short life. For shame to her parents who only thought of themselves. :furious:
Sadly there will never be justice for JonBenet.
Although, after reading at this link, I wouldn't doubt the evilness in that family, and pre-meditated murder may have been the way it went.
RDI Theorists - Page 7 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
:cow: JMO
P.S. - Alix, I think your signature is hilarious. :blushing:
Hey, you and Fair-whatever couldn't resist making two posts about my sig. YOU two need to get back on track.
Good question about the crying. I don't know the answer.
I just noticed the pineapple bowl it too far away for a child to reach. It is up past the place mats. If a child was sitting on their knees to reach the pine apple, the place mat at that seat would have scooted up toward the bowl on that table top.
You'll find out more about him towards the end of the book. But in a nutshell, Kane was the lead specialist called on by the DA's office to run the Grand Jury proceedings. His record speaks for itself as a prosecutor. He probably knows the case better than anyone else.
Well, about ten years ago, he did an interview about the case in which he revealed some very interesting things.
Firstly, he said that it was unlikely that Patsy would ever confess because he own narcissism would not allow it.
Secondly, he said that he and his two fellows, Morrissey and Levin, were essentially window-dressing for the DA's office to make it look like they were really pursuing a Grand Jury case, and that it was clear to him from early on that the DA's office was firmly entrenched in the intruder theory. Kane did his job, even though it was clear that no one wanted him to do it too well.
But thirdly, and what we concern ourselves with for now, he said that Patsy loved the attention that being the mother of a famous dead beauty queen brought her.
It's a well-known historical fact, Alix, that some people are more useful dead than they were alive. I don't think Kane was trying to suggest that Patsy deliberately killed her daughter in order to get fame and sympathy, but he DID seem to suggest that Patsy's theatrical nature compelled her to make the best of a bad situation once she was convinced that JB could not be saved.