Soulmagent
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
- Messages
- 9,466
- Reaction score
- 11,023
The kidnapping 'label' does give the FBI jurisdiction to immediately step in on MP cases, offering resources that may not be available to local LE.
Also, all elements of the federal kidnapping statute do not need to be present in order to institute preliminary inquiries into a case (I believe, anyway... perhaps an attorney could weigh in here?)
So that says to me that there most likely is evidence that lead initial investigators to contact the FBI and request services, while not making public what that evidence was- and also that there is some evidence of specific individual(s) who may have committed a crime against Hailey indicative of state and federal kidnapping laws.
I see how it shows there is evidence of a kidnapping that they have but I dont see how it shows they have evidence of a specific person.
Then again there is the conflict on CCity and the FBI about terming it a kidnapping. I dont understand how they cant agree on the issue if what we speculate is true and I dont see us being wrong about there being some evidence that falls in with petes statement and the label. It has to be blood evidence. It is the only thing that seems to fit both sides of the conflict coin.
I think Pete's statements and retractions might tell us alot when this case gets to court.
I am rethinking everything he has ever said now with the idea he jumps the gun with his assumptions and reports like a prosecutor would make a closing statement and then I will attempted to pull his statements 2 feet back ,if that makes since.