madeleine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 4,972
- Reaction score
- 88
actually the most fascinating thing to me about that exchange in the OP is that PR played the whole that's between that person and god kinda stuff. about a year ago I started at this link and then read all over the net about interrogations, and what PR did is one of the things they look for when determining likelihood of guilt in an interrogation. it was NO accident the interrogator asked her this sort of question. I am 90% sure that link there states this but I've an antsy 3 year old and I cant reread it in full at this time.
normal parents of murdered children, when asked if the perp who did this deserves a second chance, or could be forgiven, etc will answer in MANY ways but the only time they answer "every one deserves a second chance" sorts of statements are when they are the perps themselves.
frankly one more nail in the RDI for me.
Thanks for the link.Well yes,of course LE can crack perps and trick them with questions when the perp has no idea where the cop got the info.But in the Ramsey case the defence knew everything LE got and they were prepared,maybe that's why the interviews turned into a circus and ,LE's hands were tied even before they even started with the questions.It's amazing how everything in this case was upside down,form a-z,a shame.