Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 1/20 Sizzle Break

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
All I want today, is for Juan to get up and just have a crack at the good doctor. That's all.

5 minutes of Juan and I can go back to my little happy place, where it's all warm and fuzzy and I'm convinced the jury has this. It's just been such a long time, since we've seen Juan in action. This doctor has been spewing crap about Travis for far too long. It's Juans turn. Come on Willmott, times up. What are you afraid of?
 
Travis has been trashed unmercifully much more than any other victim than I can remember. Even normal things that most 30 year old single healthy males do has been twisted as meaning something sinister.

The DT and their ilk have put Travis on trial from moment one in the guilt phase and continue to pound him further into the ground that Arias put him in.

They have murdered him all over again. It is as if he has been strung up even in death inside that courtroom and the defense has torched his good character and gentle spirit and laughs as it goes up in flames. And all based on the pathological lies of the one who killed him. Or based on unsupported claims by witnesses too cowardly to show their face.

It reminds me very much of the times before there was a law protecting rape victims for being blamed for being raped. Until then defense attorneys always blamed the victim and accused them of 'asking for it' by the way they dressed.. the way they acted or the way they looked or where they were at the time of the rape, etc..

This defense has carried out an 'overkill' concerning bashing and trashing the victim in this case. It is unlike anything I have ever seen before.

I hope once this is over that the Alexander family will go before Congress asking them to enact a protection law for murdered victims just like the law that protects rape victims from being put on trial instead of the actual perpetrator.


:goodpost::goodpost: Very well said, OBE !

BBM: Yes, that would be great !

It is outrageous that the Alexander Family suffered through these awful lies day-by-day, week-by-week, month-by-month, and year-by-year !

:please: for Travis and his Family !
 
I truly think that if the jury believes that JA has gone to extreme lengths to falsely accuse TA of being an abuser this will not help her get LWOP. There has been no friends, ex-girlfriends, relatives, etc. who have witnessed Travis being anything other than a kind and gentle soul willing to extend a hand to help anyone in need. His life just does not reflect that. jmo
 
:seeya: JM is a wizard of a prosecutor, and my brain is, of course, no match for his, but I do try to imagine what his strategy will be after every despicable defence presentation.

The question I have from yesterday is, why was he so adamant that MDLR's name not be connected with these affidavits? We all know she took them, and no doubt notarized them, because that's the essence of her job as Mitigation Specialist. She can testify concerning them. I assume he cannot call her to the stand because she is a member of the defence team. None of that answers why he wants her name left out. Any ideas on where his genius is going on this?

My thoughts were was maybe Juan thought the statements would hold more weight with the jury if these statements had been given by one of her lawyers. Sometimes we are lead to believe people in power (cops, lawyers, etc) more than we should, JMHO.
 
OK. I suppose its a risk the DT is willing to take. They may also be gambling on perhaps Juan not being able to call Deanna.

One fear I have is the judge telling Juan that he can only cross Geff for anything about the affidativs. That would sure put a damper on things if that happens. I hope JSS allows more than that although you never know.

Juan can use the video of Deanna's prior testimony.

Ethically aren't they beholden to at least confirm to some certainty the truth of the statements put forth?

ie. confirm that this bishop not only saw both TA and MM the day in question and for the matters MM has purported, but also confirm with DR that MM and his wife administered first aid to her in her hour of need... or hey, I have a great idea, why not check with the authorities, surely this MM and his wife reported this abusive behaviour, let alone tried to have someone(gee maybe it's a huge ring with the church officials too...) apprehended that they believed was such a threat to children, sheesh.

No, they are not required to look for evidence to dispute or confirm their witnesses' stories.

AZL: Would JM be able to bring up the magazine where CMJA wrote in code about getting their story straight?

If he's crossing Jodi. Or if Matt McCartney is one of the affidavit writers.

@jeffgoldesq: Evidentiary Abomination in #JodiArias. Generally an expert witness is given wide latitude to include in testimony... http://t.co/iU0naDBgMA

https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=815963421783976

I don't think Mr. Gold realizes the evidentiary rules are different for this phase.
 
Travis has been trashed unmercifully much more than any other victim than I can remember. Even normal things that most 30 year old single healthy males do has been twisted as meaning something sinister.

The DT and their ilk have put Travis on trial from moment one in the guilt phase and continue to pound him further into the ground that Arias put him in.

They have murdered him all over again. It is as if he has been strung up even in death inside that courtroom and the defense has torched his good character and gentle spirit and laughs as it goes up in flames. And all based on the pathological lies of the one who killed him. Or based on unsupported claims by witnesses too cowardly to show their face.

It reminds me very much of the times before there was a law protecting rape victims for being blamed for being raped. Until then defense attorneys always blamed the victim and accused them of 'asking for it' by the way they dressed.. the way they acted or the way they looked or where they were at the time of the rape, etc..

This defense has carried out an 'overkill' concerning bashing and trashing the victim in this case. It is unlike anything I have ever seen before.

I hope once this is over that the Alexander family will go before Congress asking them to enact a protection law for murdered victims just like the law that protects rape victims from being put on trial instead of the actual perpetrator.

OBE,
I love your posts, your passion and I really hate to ask, but is this any chance you can make your font a bit bigger? I have horrible eye sight and I'm on a tablet and I struggle to read your posts and I hate to miss them because I always love what you have to say. I hope I haven't insulted you, just asking nicely.
 
My thoughts were was maybe Juan thought the statements would hold more weight with the jury if these statements had been given by one of her lawyers. Sometimes we are lead to believe people in power (cops, lawyers, etc) more than we should, JMHO.

Nosy...this. :). Can't think of any other reason.
 
Juan can use the video of Deanna's prior testimony.



No, they are not required to look for evidence to dispute or confirm their witnesses' stories.



If he's crossing Jodi. Or if Matt McCartney is one of the affidavit writers.



I don't think Mr. Gold realizes the evidentiary rules are different for this phase.


AZL, I asked yesterday it didn't see a reply. Are you sick!? If so, hope you're feeling better today.
 
Anyone else watch Vanderpump Rules? The Kristen girl on there reminds me CMJA with her crazy neediness and lack of insight.

I think this every time I watch it. Kristen is going to go 'Jodi Arias' on poor Tom someday.
 
The defense never ever thinks ahead and what doors they are opening. It was not a great idea to bring up Mormon Bishops. Jodi Arias went to , check this........not hers but Travis' Bishop to tell on Travis that he was engaged in a sexual relationship with her.

How utterly ridiculous. Why not go to HERS if she wanted to repent and seek guidance?
When she talked to the Bishop....three guesses what she did. She lied.
He likely instructed her to go to her own to seek her own help since TRAVIS WAS DEAD!

So being sent to her own, what does she then do?
She LIED TO ANOTHER BISHOP.

Yeah, I think this entire matter is going to backfire on Jodi Arias, to biblical proportions. It reminds me of her trying to blackmail the family and the State by having the unmitigated gall to say that a trial would bring
humiliation to the family, to the Mormon church as a whole, and hold on to your seats.....possibly reflect poorly on the Presidential election ( Mitt Romney being Mormon ).


She got a very loud f u response to that

when the family was utterly unwaivering, so was the State and Mitt Romney when interviewed on the fly by a reporter responded publicly that the Mormon church has no official position on the death penalty. The inference one could draw is Mitt Romney was saying...we are OK with it.

It was a very loud f u Jodi Arias


I think if the defense lawyers for Jodi Arias want to bring a Mormon Bishop into this trial, they better ....for once in this entire six years think through the inevitable of how Juan Martinez will handle it. It will be like a bomb blowing up right there at the defense table.

One cannot use it as a shield and a sword......she is playing this Mormon card way wrong. I've never seen a more misguided legal strategy than putting forth such easily discounted lies in Affidavits. That is save and except for the part where Jen told the judge yesterday she wants it on the record in front of the jury that MariaDeLaRosa is the one who took the Affidavits, as that will lend credibility to them.

Maria DeLaRosa..............if I were this defense team, KNOWING what Juan Martinez has on her and how it will be career suicide for them to put her veracity up under the microscope, I would be telling her get off social media. NOW. Never say another word about this case, publicly or privately. Tone down your ruffles. Do everything you can to lay low. Don't be seen laughing with Jodi or passing notes between she and her mom, etc. Never ever go to the jail without one of us with you. Stay off the Jodi support pages. Cease all contact with her unstable followers. In their attempt to show that they ARE an insider they often post every exchange you have with them. Do not speak to any reporters. Do not tweet or private message anyone and for the love of God do not make three way calls with Jodi Arias. Just fade into the background and off the front the page. I would be telling her this in a tone of a direct order not a suggestion and when our conversation ended she would "get it".

They never ever ever think hmmmmm what will Juan do in response if we do X. It is the oddest thing I have ever seen. I used to think surely they had to be just playing dumb, and why not , the court lets them get away with it. With this stunt with the Affidavits and how horribly it is going to backfire, I have changed my mind. They are not feigning ignorance, as Judge Perry would have said.
 
:seeya: JM is a wizard of a prosecutor, and my brain is, of course, no match for his, but I do try to imagine what his strategy will be after every despicable defence presentation.

The question I have from yesterday is, why was he so adamant that MDLR's name not be connected with these affidavits? We all know she took them, and no doubt notarized them, because that's the essence of her job as Mitigation Specialist. She can testify concerning them. I assume he cannot call her to the stand because she is a member of the defence team. None of that answers why he wants her name left out. Any ideas on where his genius is going on this?

:seeya:

Just jumping off your post here, NP:

1st BBM: Is the 'mitigation specialist' a Notary ?

I read her so-called "credentials" a while back when all her shenanigans as "Cougarlicious" were exposed, but I do NOT remember seeing Notary on there, but maybe I missed it ?


2nd BBM: Jumping off above as to whether or not she is a "notary" and IF she is, then I would assume she could testify as these Affidavits were taken under oath ... :waitasec: oh wait -- this is the JA DT we're talking about here :gaah:

:) I'm certain AZLawyer will have the answer to that one.


3rd BBM: I don't understand that either ... I would think Juan would want to put "Cougarlicious" on the stand to expose all her unethical shenanigans ...

But Juan knows best !

:moo:
 
Geff USED the date Feb, 2 2007 in his testimony yesterday describing when JA and TA became a "official" couple.


Feb 18, 2007


Hi Abe I'm writing you for a few reasons. Let me get the more trivial ones out of the way first. I tried reaching you by phone during the week without any luck. Probably because I've been calling at ridiculous hours of the night after I'm off work. Like the last three months, I find myself once again near the end of the billing cycle of my cell phone, out of minutes, and paying through the teeth to talk on the phone during daylight hours. But I digress. The reason I've been trying to reach you is to let you know that I was listening to the online version of "Never Before never again" at freedomvideos.com (?) and some thoughful jerk laced a voice over on Mr. Stonecipher toward the end of the video. He says "there has never been a better time or a better opportunity than right now at Pre-Paid Loser" I am not joking. That's what you hear. If you want to hear it for yourself, go the video. It's about 11 minutes and 45 seconds into it. Just thought I would make you aware of that, since you use that on occasion for your prospects.



The other, and more important reason that I am writing to you is regarding our friendship. You have been a wonderful source of information on many levels and I appreciate your insight and perspective. I'm glad that we met, and I'm glad we are friends. But after considering a few aspects of our friendship, such as the conversation we had the other night revisiting the dream you had to the hug we exchanged at the last AFT in Anaheim. I think we should re-think our conduct toward each other. I know that between you and me those things are simply gestures of a functioning friendship between a couple of single individuals. Up until recently I've considered myself single, and I never would have considered it to be inappropriate or even given it a second thought. Although I'm not married and I'm not Travis' girlfriend.



From now going forward I feel that you and I should keep a friendly distance. I'm certainly not suggesting that we ignore each other, but even something as simple as a hug can be misconstrued as something it is not. You and I and everyone are hugging everyone else in this business. We are like a big family. So it may seem somewhat like a foreign request on my part, but you're a pretty savvy guy, so I know you'll understand.



I'm aware that you like me, and you've made that pretty clear. I'm flattered by that. I hesitate to tell you all of this only because I am reminded of the stories you've shared with me about women taking it the wrong way (like when you prospect them, for example). Your internal dialogue is less than friendly ("Look, lady. I didn't ask and I'm not interested in you anyway!") So in considering that, please know that I'm not assuming that you're still pursuing me or that you see me as some kind of prize that you're striving (??) for. We rarely talk outside of PPL events, and I am fully aware that you have a life completely outside the realm of "Jodi" which involves a blossoming business, a large social circle and network of people, and most likely many other female interest as well.



You already know that I'm seeing Travis. I've never divulged many details about our relationship simply because I consider certain details to be sacred and private, and should be kept between him and I anyway. I know I've told you that we are not in a committed relationship, but regardless of our status, I care so deeply about him. I often ask myself, how would Travis feel about this? Or, how I would I feel if Travis were doing what I'm doing right now with someone else? In fact, this reasoning has been a compelling force behind all of my actions, decisions and conduct as of late.



Now I'm sure you're already aware of this, but when we hugged at the Grove a few weeks ago, my intention was nothing more than to warmly greet a friend and business associate. But I've since given this further thought and I've asked myself, would I have acted the same if Travis were there that day? In truth, I would not have. And this leads me to question my own character. I don't want to be inconsistent, especially not when it involves something and someone that is so important to me. Granted, human behavior is often modified and adjusted under various circumstances. Everyone does this, it is natural. But at this point, none of that matters to me. What matters to me is how that which I am accountable for would make Travis feel. I care more about him than I ever have. His happiness is of cardinal significance to me, and his feelings and opinions I value more greatly than gold.



I didn't write this email to expound upon my secret worship-Travis-agenda. I only wanted to clear a few things up, if not for you, then for myself. For I'm sure you already "get" all of this anyway. But at least now I've said it, and I can rest easier knowing that we are on the same page about things. I think you're a great person who's never had a single bad intention toward me, and I appreciate all of the time you've taken to impart to me your knowledge, perspectives, and experiences. I will certainly see you around at events, to which you bring a lively energy.Take care until then, Jodi
 
I don't know who could combat the evil that pervades this courtroom better than Juan Martinez. He is an unfailing advocate for justice and reason in the midst of what feels like a demented circus. I think he has an incredible ability to think on his feet, to switch directions and recall huge amounts of data without all the "shuffle, dig, scrounge, search" the DT is always doing. He is prepared, focused and no-nonsense. He is a true champion for justice. When things ramp up to defcon 10 on the crazy meter in this courtroom (all too often) , I remind myself of these things.

Arias was Travis' worst nightmare. Juan Martinez is Arias' worst nightmare and she knows it.
 
My thoughts were was maybe Juan thought the statements would hold more weight with the jury if these statements had been given by one of her lawyers. Sometimes we are lead to believe people in power (cops, lawyers, etc) more than we should, JMHO.

Good point. Thank you. It appears I missed a tweet reporting JW as saying MDLR's name would lend more credibility to the affidavits.

(Did I mention, I hate 'trial by tweets'?)
 
Geff USED the date Feb, 2 2007 in his testimony yesterday describing when JA and TA became a "official" couple.


Feb 18, 2007


Hi Abe I'm writing you for a few reasons. Let me get the more trivial ones out of the way first. I tried reaching you by phone during the week without any luck. Probably because I've been calling at ridiculous hours of the night after I'm off work. Like the last three months, I find myself once again near the end of the billing cycle of my cell phone, out of minutes, and paying through the teeth to talk on the phone during daylight hours. But I digress. The reason I've been trying to reach you is to let you know that I was listening to the online version of "Never Before never again" at freedomvideos.com (?) and some thoughful jerk laced a voice over on Mr. Stonecipher toward the end of the video. He says "there has never been a better time or a better opportunity than right now at Pre-Paid Loser" I am not joking. That's what you hear. If you want to hear it for yourself, go the video. It's about 11 minutes and 45 seconds into it. Just thought I would make you aware of that, since you use that on occasion for your prospects.



The other, and more important reason that I am writing to you is regarding our friendship. You have been a wonderful source of information on many levels and I appreciate your insight and perspective. I'm glad that we met, and I'm glad we are friends. But after considering a few aspects of our friendship, such as the conversation we had the other night revisiting the dream you had to the hug we exchanged at the last AFT in Anaheim. I think we should re-think our conduct toward each other. I know that between you and me those things are simply gestures of a functioning friendship between a couple of single individuals. Up until recently I've considered myself single, and I never would have considered it to be inappropriate or even given it a second thought. Although I'm not married and I'm not Travis' girlfriend.[u/]



From now going forward I feel that you and I should keep a friendly distance. I'm certainly not suggesting that we ignore each other, but even something as simple as a hug can be misconstrued as something it is not. You and I and everyone are hugging everyone else in this business. We are like a big family. So it may seem somewhat like a foreign request on my part, but you're a pretty savvy guy, so I know you'll understand.



I'm aware that you like me, and you've made that pretty clear. I'm flattered by that. I hesitate to tell you all of this only because I am reminded of the stories you've shared with me about women taking it the wrong way (like when you prospect them, for example). Your internal dialogue is less than friendly ("Look, lady. I didn't ask and I'm not interested in you anyway!") So in considering that, please know that I'm not assuming that you're still pursuing me or that you see me as some kind of prize that you're striving (??) for. We rarely talk outside of PPL events, and I am fully aware that you have a life completely outside the realm of "Jodi" which involves a blossoming business, a large social circle and network of people, and most likely many other female interest as well.



You already know that I'm seeing Travis. I've never divulged many details about our relationship simply because I consider certain details to be sacred and private, and should be kept between him and I anyway. I know I've told you that we are not in a committed relationship, but regardless of our status, I care so deeply about him. I often ask myself, how would Travis feel about this? Or, how I would I feel if Travis were doing what I'm doing right now with someone else? In fact, this reasoning has been a compelling force behind all of my actions, decisions and conduct as of late.



Now I'm sure you're already aware of this, but when we hugged at the Grove a few weeks ago, my intention was nothing more than to warmly greet a friend and business associate. But I've since given this further thought and I've asked myself, would I have acted the same if Travis were there that day? In truth, I would not have. And this leads me to question my own character. I don't want to be inconsistent, especially not when it involves something and someone that is so important to me. Granted, human behavior is often modified and adjusted under various circumstances. Everyone does this, it is natural. But at this point, none of that matters to me. What matters to me is how that which I am accountable for would make Travis feel. I care more about him than I ever have. His happiness is of cardinal significance to me, and his feelings and opinions I value more greatly than gold.



I didn't write this email to expound upon my secret worship-Travis-agenda. I only wanted to clear a few things up, if not for you, then for myself. For I'm sure you already "get" all of this anyway. But at least now I've said it, and I can rest easier knowing that we are on the same page about things. I think you're a great person who's never had a single bad intention toward me, and I appreciate all of the time you've taken to impart to me your knowledge, perspectives, and experiences. I will certainly see you around at events, to which you bring a lively energy.Take care until then, Jodi


Just another lie that can be proved by her own words. She really isn't the brightest bulb in the pack. is she?
 
:seeya:

Just jumping off your post here, NP:

1st BBM: Is the 'mitigation specialist' a Notary ?

I read her so-called "credentials" a while back when all her shenanigans as "Cougarlicious" were exposed, but I do NOT remember seeing Notary on there, but maybe I missed it ?


2nd BBM: Jumping off above as to whether or not she is a "notary" and IF she is, then I would assume she could testify as these Affidavits were taken under oath ... :waitasec: oh wait -- this is the JA DT we're talking about here :gaah:

:) I'm certain AZLawyer will have the answer to that one.


3rd BBM: I don't understand that either ... I would think Juan would want to put "Cougarlicious" on the stand to expose all her unethical shenanigans ...

But Juan knows best !

:moo:

I`m assuming she is, dgc. In Canada most officers of the court, and their significant staff, are.
 
I was thinking about C. Lay. She leads to believe emails to and from Travis they had sex, but yet she said to Juan they didn't? Am I misunderstanding something?
 
L
All I want today, is for Juan to get up and just have a crack at the good doctor. That's all.

5 minutes of Juan and I can go back to my little happy place, where it's all warm and fuzzy and I'm convinced the jury has this. It's just been such a long time, since we've seen Juan in action. This doctor has been spewing crap about Travis for far too long. It's Juans turn. Come on Willmott, times up. What are you afraid of?

I'm sure my lack of knowledge about the law, especially regarding mitigation, will be obvious, BUT....why can't SS say "enough!" defense is beating a dead horse with all of these allegations. The majority are just a recycling of allegations made previously. She should be saying "move along," and allow JM to cross these people. And this whole affidavit issue is crazy to me...I just don't get this judge...I get the fear of appeal mindset, but she has lost all control of the proceedings. The only reason I can fathom that she was assigned to this case was b/c it was viewed as so damn straight forward, and black & white.

Who would have imagined that she would have so little belief in her decision making ability? All she has managed to do is enable the DT to inflick unimaginable pain on the Alexander family, while allowing the DT to make her out to be a complete fool.

:stormingmad:
 
Hey everyone, Good morning :-) I have a few questions, first what time does court start today, and when this trial is over, which side has the final words to the jury, Juan Martinez or nurmi? Thanks :-) God bless Travis and Travis' family.

OH wait, one more question, what does Temple recommend mean? Thanks!
 
What the world is seeing is true EVIL. Jodi Arias is dancing on Travis Alexander's grave. Period.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
165
Guests online
265
Total visitors
430

Forum statistics

Threads
609,438
Messages
18,254,135
Members
234,653
Latest member
Cheyenne233
Back
Top