I have a question - if any of the people supplying affidavits have criminal backgrounds, can Juan point this out somehow? Is there anyway to refer to the person's reputation, as they are not there to answer? Sorry if this doesn't make sense.
I would love for this jury to see those magazines! I would also love it if Juan could play a tape from one of JA's jail visits where SHE was telling the visitor what to say.Maybe JM could reintroduce the smuggled magazines to discredit McGee's affidavit?
I would love for this jury to see those magazines! I would also love it if Juan could play a tape from one of JA's jail visits where SHE was telling the visitor what to say.
So far all the affidavits sound to me like they came from the JA support sites, where nobody really knows her or has even met her!
I'm sorry but this is total ********. The reason we so readily disregarded the stuff Matt from New Zealand said is because we know his history of crazy. This jury does not. Will they accept the fact that someone will actually LIE like this? These are very serious things to lie about - domestic violence and pedophilia. If I were on this jury I might go "Well what reason does this witness have to lie? The ex girlfriend might be lying to protect Travis' memory". So my question is can JM bring up some of the ******** Matt has been typing and saying online or is he limited by the fact that this coward didn't reveal his name?
Other thread is getting full so this one is open until court tomorrow afternoon. :silly:
I'm worried. JSS has let enough foolishness in front of this jury for some numbskull on the jury to say "hell, I 'm worn out. I don't know which way is up, I'm so confused. But where there is smoke, must be a little bit of fire. He picked the wrong girl to mess around with. Give her life."
That makes me sick to my stomach, but I'm for real worried.
I'm worried. JSS has let enough foolishness in front of this jury for some numbskull on the jury to say "hell, I 'm worn out. I don't know which way is up, I'm so confused. But where there is smoke, must be a little bit of fire. He picked the wrong girl to mess around with. Give her life."
That makes me sick to my stomach, but I'm for real worried.
I know I have seen in other cases where additional witnesses were added in a rebuttal case that weren't on the original rebuttal list.
Iirc, this was because the defense brought up something new in their part of the case and the Judges allowed the state to rebut it with additional witnesses in their rebuttal case.
So will Juan also be afforded the same by JSS or will he be hamstrung leaving the DT to get away with having witnesses say anything they want without Juan having any way to rebuke them?
If so, how in the world can anyone say this is about fairness and justice?
I'm worried.
JSS has let enough foolishness in front of this jury for some numbskull on the jury to say "hell, I 'm worn out. I don't know which way is up, I'm so confused. But where there is smoke, must be a little bit of fire. He picked the wrong girl to mess around with. Give her life."
That makes me sick to my stomach, but I'm for real worried.
I'm worried. JSS has let enough foolishness in front of this jury for some numbskull on the jury to say "hell, I 'm worn out. I don't know which way is up, I'm so confused. But where there is smoke, must be a little bit of fire. He picked the wrong girl to mess around with. Give her life."
That makes me sick to my stomach, but I'm for real worried.
I am not worried but I am mad as hell.
I wont get worried until I see that Juan has been given no way to rebut these claims.
I have total faith in Juan. There have been times in this trial I was worried because the DT has played gutter ball from the beginning but once Juan had his chance to set the record straight I realized I didn't have to worry after all.
I am keeping the faith that Juan can and will bring the truth forward.
IMO