Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 1/9-1/12 Break

[pinkandgreenmom]

Does she always wear her fake glasses when the jury isn't around?

 

[dog.gone.cute]

From AZ Central:

Tom Tingle@TomTingle2


Prosecutor #JuanMartinez argues that death should still be option for #JodiArias during Fri court session #death pic.twitter.com/WxT13jDRnj

 

[ButForFortune]

I don't know how Nurmi can say with a straight face that it isn't simple to just subpoena these 14 reluctant mitigation witnesses. Of course it is just that simple. The only difficulty would be the witness out of the country. So subpoena the other 13 and get them to the courthouse. The could face contempt of court charges if they refuse to appear. (I believe - not really sure about Arizona law.) And I suppose some of these 14 are possibly family members? And they won't willingly face cyber-bullying to save their family member from death? GMAB!

 

[elementary]

From AZ Central:

Tom Tingle@TomTingle2

#JodiArias looks around during Fri. hearing in her sentencing phase retrial. #Nurmi argued death should not be option pic.twitter.com/wEIrUwlsku

Awww, murderer is still bummed that the courts of appeal don't love her.

 

[dog.gone.cute]

From AZ Central:

Tom Tingle@TomTingle2


#JudgeSherryStephens listens to arguments from #JodiArias defense attorney that death penalty should not be option pic.twitter.com/NRdvA9ZCI0

Tom Tingle@TomTingle2

#JodiArias defense attorney Kirk Nurmi argues Fri. that death penalty should not be option for Arias #deathpenalty pic.twitter.com/IW1bVxs449

 

[Truth Detector]

IIRC, when the witnesses were questioned about *advertiser censored*, I thought Juan clarified it by saying did you find any pics of nudity from the waist up? Am I wrong about that?

It stands out to me because I thought it was a little strange.

True, but definition of *advertiser censored* includes words as well as images, videos, etc.

The *advertiser censored* that was found -- IIRC -- was only the names of URLs; i.e., website names.

There were no pornographic images/videos found, let alone child *advertiser censored*.

None, nada, zero, zip, zilch, null set, etc.

 

[Nosey Parker]

From AZ Central:

Tom Tingle@TomTingle2

#JodiArias looks around during Fri. hearing in her sentencing phase retrial. #Nurmi argued death should not be option pic.twitter.com/wEIrUwlsku

If looks could kill!

 

[Nikki In Denver]

From AZ Central:

Tom Tingle@TomTingle2

#JodiArias looks around during Fri. hearing in her sentencing phase retrial. #Nurmi argued death should not be option pic.twitter.com/wEIrUwlsku

:hills:

 

[LambChop]

Did I not issue a warning yesterday about the bickering back and forth about the judge. Everyone has their own opinion, so let's leave it at that. Do not badger another poster over what their beliefs are regarding the judge. This is the retrial thread, not the JSS thread. Let it go and move on. You can still express your feelings, just do not criticize what others are posting.

Thank you

 

[AngelWings444]

William Pitts ‏@william_pitts 1m1 minute ago
Martinez says there's video of the "secret testimony' that could be used. And he even admits it hurts prosecution. #JodiArias

This is the one tweet that has me convinced JA threw someone under the bus! Which family member is it?

 

[Hope4More]

Last note by BK...Nurmi says he may have to take it (upcoming JSS ruling) to a higher court, and that the decision whether she should testify again won't be made until court(s) resolve.

 

[geevee]

True, but definition of *advertiser censored* includes words as well as images, videos, etc.

The *advertiser censored* that was found -- IIRC -- was only the names of URLs; i.e., website names.

There were no pornographic images/videos found, let alone child *advertiser censored*.

None, nada, zero, zip, zilch, null set, etc.

BBM

Yes, and the vast majority, if not all of them, were put there either by viruses or Spybot's Immunize feature. *advertiser censored* was never an issue before because it has nothing to do with her killing Travis, just a 'look over there!' deflection by the defense that apparently, and hopefully, JSS has seen through.

 

[Frigga]

Wonder how her minions will spin this?

Judge says she'll be out- no later than Monday!

 

[memoriesbymichelle]

new twitter update from our infamous twit

All of the judge's denials have guaranteed that Jodi will never be executed.

The defense files motions to make a record, aware that the inexperienced judge will deny them.

Her inexperience has guaranteed that Jodi's case will be overturned. And Juan's misconduct has sealed the deal.


I sure wish the judge read her tweets.

 

[LambChop]

I don't know how Nurmi can say with a straight face that it isn't simple to just subpoena these 14 reluctant mitigation witnesses. Of course it is just that simple. The only difficulty would be the witness out of the country. So subpoena the other 13 and get them to the courthouse. The could face contempt of court charges if they refuse to appear. (I believe - not really sure about Arizona law.) And I suppose some of these 14 are possibly family members? And they won't willingly face cyber-bullying to save their family member from death? GMAB!

Could it be that they are not residents of Arizona? That would make more difficult.

 

[camcneishg]

At least with JSS taking it under advisement will stop KN from an appeals prior to lunch time Monday.....so we may see half day of court if we are lucky.....

 

[pinkandgreenmom]

Last note by BK...Nurmi says he may have to take it (upcoming JSS ruling) to a higher court, and that the decision whether she should testify again won't be made until court(s) resolve.

*advertiser censored* is dead in the water - this must be Plan B for stall tactics.

 

[LinasK]

Last note by BK...Nurmi says he may have to take it (upcoming JSS ruling) to a higher court, and that the decision whether she should testify again won't be made until court(s) resolve.

Oh, of course, he's gonna take it to the US Supreme Court, like they'd agree to hear it!:doh:

 

[Frigga]

William Pitts ‏@william_pitts 1m1 minute ago
Martinez says there's video of the "secret testimony' that could be used. And he even admits it hurts prosecution. #JodiArias

This is the one tweet that has me convinced JA threw someone under the bus! Which family member is it?

That was taken SO out of context. He was actually addressing the fact that if the witnesses refuse to testify, and they instead use video, affidavits or audio testimony- that it hurts the prosecution- in their ability to cross examine. A hit, he is apparently easily willing to take, to get this show on the road. We all know where it will lead, anyway, even if her 14... no wait 11 witnesses were willing to actually testify in person.

 

[Hope4More]

Per BK. JSS indicated that ALL motions under review should be decided by Monday.