Veering off from your excellent point, Val, isn't it ironic that she should quote in that email "I know the tone of an email or text message can sometime be ambiguous since the receiver is only interpreting what the tone of the sender would be if it were spoken ...", and then have ALV and Dr. F. interpret and 'diagnose', under oath.
If CMJA says she's a victim of child sex abuse, she wouldn't have been picking up pamphlets from the mall to help Travis with his "alleged issues".
She can't draw a straight line from point A to point B with any of her lies because they just don't make sense, by any sort of means, psychologically, mentally, socially, for someone who was abused as a child, abused as an adult, whatever.
She's a "predator". She takes what she wants, when she wants, and if she's not appeased, she lashes out. And she loves to torture her "prey" and it's social circle through slander, harassment, stalking, theft, lies, deception.............
She's always been a sick puppy and always will be. Some people are just born evil.
I'm right there with you, Nosey!!!!:gaah: If you've ever been a Mod for a group or forum, or been misunderstood on a group online, "interpretation" is "key". Like 10 people who witness an accident, they all interpret the scene in their own way.
CMJA had a tendency to "poke the bear" when Travis was upset with her. She just egged him on......."...who me?" Deflection.
I don't know how he managed to stick it out as long as he did.
Just read JA's letter to her 'VIP supporters', it seems like in a nutshell the only people she trusts are those who send her money, everyone else gets bashed. It's *all* about the money. My only question is, what will these supporters get in return - ever? She is very big on taking - their heartfelt support, money, kind words, donations, books, cash, whatever, but does she give anything in return except softsoap so they'll continue to keep her in candybars and funds labelled for appeal? Teeny tiny-script postcards full of the subcontext of 'Just send me dough? I'm embarrassed that fellow human beings support her in any fashion, how gullible can people be? I still find it hard to fathom that she can run this mini-empire from behind bars, there really should be a law against it.
If CMJA begins to use the "I was a child sex abuse victim" line can JM ask her how come this has never come up in 8 years since the murder, and never came up in the previous trial or used as mitigation in the last penalty phase? She has changed her defence from the last time, she was a supposed DV victim last time, that didn't work so now it's the "Travis was a paedophile" defence.
Just read JA's letter to her 'VIP supporters', it seems like in a nutshell the only people she trusts are those who send her money, everyone else gets bashed. It's *all* about the money. My only question is, what will these supporters get in return - ever? She is very big on taking - their heartfelt support, money, kind words, donations, books, cash, whatever, but does she give anything in return except softsoap so they'll continue to keep her in candybars and funds labelled for appeal? Teeny tiny-script postcards full of the subcontext of 'Just send me dough? I'm embarrassed that fellow human beings support her in any fashion, how gullible can people be? I still find it hard to fathom that she can run this mini-empire from behind bars, there really should be a law against it.
I haven't posted in a few days because I can't stand trial by tweet and the constant delays by the DT. But I just have to ask, since this is the first trial I have followed closely: Is this normal? Is it normal for a murder trial to take this long?
geevee, please repost this in the new thread. I would like to reply but don't want the conversation to get buried.