Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/09-11

[krkrjx]

:gaah:

I am 64 and a half years old. I cannot hope to understand all of this computer business although I have had one since 1995 and my work involved having to use the computer on a daily basis.

No matter what else is stated by the defense or whomever, CMJA did viciously murder Travis. She has been found guilty. I am sick of this farce going on in the courtroom.

I believe CMJA richly deserves the DP and certainly would give it to her. I have hoped in the past that Travis' family would see this through to the bitter end for the jury to decide whether or not they will give CMJA the DP, but have changed my mind now. I would hope JSS would sentence CMJA to LWOP. Let her do it. Let's end this farce once and for all.

This is so ridiculous and will never end otherwise.

:moo:

I agree. This trial bordered on ridiculous for a long time but it has long since crossed that border. Time to be done with it.

 

[Hatfield]

I agree. This trial bordered on ridiculous for a long time but it has long since crossed that border. Time to be done with it.

Agree. I dont know why Juan can't bring up a "Motion to Dismiss" or "Motion to Deny" or "Motion to throw out" now.

He needs to bring the judge the realization that the original charges cannot be proven becuase the DT has no evidence to support their charges. It has been proven there is no evidence.
Enough.

The judge can deny it at this time and tell the DT they can bring up the charge again when they have evidence to backup their claims.

ETA And the evidence had better be on that original copy they were given. Not an altered or modified copy in any way shape or form.

 

[rose222]

Why do they need 90-minute lunch breaks? This ain't Paris. :gaah:

 

[Nali87]

:gaah:

I am 64 and a half years old. I cannot hope to understand all of this computer business although I have had one since 1995 and my work involved having to use the computer on a daily basis.

No matter what else is stated by the defense or whomever, CMJA did viciously murder Travis. She has been found guilty. I am sick of this farce going on in the courtroom.

I believe CMJA richly deserves the DP and certainly would give it to her. I have hoped in the past that Travis' family would see this through to the bitter end for the jury to decide whether or not they will give CMJA the DP, but have changed my mind now. I would hope JSS would sentence CMJA to LWOP. Let her do it. Let's end this farce once and for all.

This is so ridiculous and will never end otherwise.

:moo:

Stay strong! Take comfort from the fact that it's either LWOP or the DP for Ms. No Sex Drive.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Yes, Juan has hired him. BN has mentioned this twice.

Thanks MeeBee.
This is what disturbs me.

 

[CarolinaMoon]

Yes, I think Wilmott is playing with semantics when she claims they already have the "original". She's using that to mean the 2008 copy, hoping that JSS won't understand the difference. Apparently, their "expert" didn't know what was required, or how to do it.
Also, I think using the word "*advertiser censored*" on the computer is another case of semantics. In the first trial they were talking about *advertiser censored* images - remember, JM asking about nude photo's etc. But here they're talking about links - probably left from the antivirus primarily. They're saying there may have been one actual visit, but that could have been TA being curious what exactly the viruses were linked to?

Thank you for clarifying this point, that all that testimony was to pictures on the computer that had actually been accessed by Travis. We're talking apples and oranges here.

 

[WhoaIsMe]

Thanks so much to everyone who compiles tweets here. I've got to run out and buy a Christmas tree. My grandson made a point to tell me that I had "not made one yet" the other day, so I need to fix that before he comes back over. Because of you guys I can catch up later.

I really appreciate everything you do.

 

[AZlawyer]

Why do they need 90-minute lunch breaks? This ain't Paris. :gaah:

Because that's how long it takes to get lunch in downtown Phoenix.

 

[geevee]

Thanks MeeBee.
This is what disturbs me.

I'm relatively certain JM has not hired BN for computer forensics, more like just audio/visual enhancements, as is BN's specialty.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Because that's how long it takes to get lunch in downtown Phoenix.

Gives us all time to decompress too.

 

[Hatfield]

The other thing that Juans expert said is he still has the original clone copy. So another remedy to this madness is Juan can request to the judge like this....

"Look. We still have the original copy. We will be glad to give the DT another copy of the original copy. Since the DT is not providing evidence from that original, just give them another one and lets deny this DT action until they have evidence right from an original copy.

The DT cannot claim things when they are not supplying evidence that matches that original copy.

 

[geevee]

I won't be able to post any tweets this afternoon, will be back and forth between this room and another so someone else please grab and paste them. Many thanks.

 

[rose222]

Watch this short video (1:22) if you want to smile...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg23qOHGgfc

 

[Love Never Fails]

I'm relatively certain JM has not hired BN for computer forensics, more like just audio/visual enhancements, as is BN's specialty.

Oh yes I am sure. But it is the way both sides attack each other and the way defense "experts" are allowed to talk to the prosecutor tht disturbs me. It is just so unprofessional. Things are sure changing and have changed too much for me in my 66 years.

 

[Hatfield]

Oh yes I am sure. But it is the way both sides attack each other and the way defense "experts" are allowed to talk to the prosecutor tht disturbs me. It is just so unprofessional. Things are sure changing and have changed too much for me in my 66 years.

I suspect other judges besides JSS would have reprimanded some of the behavior we have seen in this trial.

 

[MeeBee]

I'm relatively certain JM has not hired BN for computer forensics, more like just audio/visual enhancements, as is BN's specialty.

Yes, that's what I mean. The defense retained him this time to do work he is not certified in.

 

[LaLaw2000]

I do not look at *advertiser censored* but I bet if my comp were analyzed in depth some would be found. If one does anything online they are subject to malware, adware, popups...blockers do not catch every single thing that is out there.

OMG! My computers would have some *advertiser censored* on it due to the my going to certain sites during some trials/cases. Doesn't mean this old woman habitually looks at *advertiser censored*, though!
I see your point!

 

[bsk]

From WAT:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 27s 28 seconds ago


It shows the presence of the incinerator file in the recycle.bin file. #JodiArias



Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 6s 6 seconds ago

Willmott objects, "it's completely not relevant".

None of this matters regarding this hearing and tampering with evidence. #JodiArias

This is certainly a classic. "His proving that WE tampered with evidence has nothing to do with our claim that HE tampered with evidence, which our tampered evidence clearly shows...."

 

[Truth Detector]

Why would he do that?!

This may be procedural policy given that it would instantaneously halt any writing to the hard drive as opposed to quiescing the device using the operating system. The latter approach writes to the hard drive.

 

[Hope4More]

From bk....HD #1 he looked at was the one dworkin used for trial. Made 12/09. It is an exact image of the original 2008 (clone?) HD 2-4 are not in same format. EO-1.