Prolly. But now that I'm thinking again I think Hope was right. He was stating that Juan had asked the testimony be stricken but what he says after that is confusing me. Is he trying to get that to happen by saying Juan doesn't have a right to cross examine her or is he saying the testimony shouldn't be stricken because Juan doesn't have a right to cross examine her?
They'll probably have a more in depth argument on this in the future.
What Nurmi said about JM's right to cross examine her was complete gobbelly-gook. Hopefully the transcription, not his actual words, but who knows.