Nurmi doesn't want the jury to know the killer was 'aggressive?' I think the crime photos were their first big clue.
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 29s 29 seconds ago
Nurmi again asks DeMarte to leave and Judge asks DeMarte to step out while very agitated #jodiarias #3tvarias
Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer · 1m1 minute ago
Nurmi repeats the clause about relentless assault on the defendant's character during mitigation rebuttal.
---
LOL Now JA's own answers to test questions are an assault on her character, this is so rich.
Boo boo on my part, it's not Sue's daughter, another sister's daughter. Gee... I wonder if SHE attended the trial.
This is what Alyce has listed on her website. she ain't no doctor
Anger Management, Domestic Violence Counseling for Survivors and Perpetrators,
Gender Issues, and Expert Witness[/QUOTE]
Yes- we knew this, already. The expert part, however, is in grave dispute!
This reminds me of that ol' tv show 'Have Gun, Will Travel'.
If you are very good at your job, people will come looking for you to testify. You don't have to resort to nudges. :facepalm:
ETA Bet Dr DeMarte does not have this listed on her CV.
I think I'm gonna be sick. There has been a relentless assault all right ... on Travis and his family.
The state wants to use this to show she doesn't suffer in silence and isn't always passive. Nurmi says that it is not appropriate under case law because the comment about her being a total Bword is meaningless and just an assassination on JA character.
Everyone, at this point.Jeesh Jen - who is very agitated?
If it is somebody should her it goes on the left hand
AZL, was it proper for the judge to let it in? Thanks.
From WAT:
Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 37s 38 seconds ago
JSS allows "total *****" testimony.
Heck to the yes. #jodiarias