CarolinaMoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 5,173
- Reaction score
- 126
I think there's something important people may be overlooking. During the original trial, Juan had to plod through all sorts of things in a certain sequence. And when jurors were hearing/seeing those things, they (presumably) were open-minded as whether or not any crime had been committed.
But now it's different - they already know she's guilty, so that sort of foundation is not needed. That means they are seeing everything from a different POV than the original jury. With that in mind, think about how it's going, especially today:
- Juan laid out for them earlier the absolute brutality of the crime.
- Today he went through the gas can cover-up, which they can only view as being a cover-up.
- And he went through the post-murder actions, which had to send chills up the jury's spine.
- And similarly the Flores interview has to be absolutely chilling when you know she has committed the crime.
I still think getting 12 out of 12 is an almost impossible hurdle, but I don't see how Juan could be laying it out any better for the jury, and in a remarkably short amount of time. When you think about their POV, you half wonder if they are able to sleep at night knowing they are in the presence of a cold-blooded butcher.
Thank you for saying what I wanted to, but you did it far better than I ever could!
This jury does have a different perspective. They know JA is guilty and don't have to make that decision. They watched the videos from that point of view. On NG last night, one of the people who was in the courtroom observed one male juror in the second row who seemed to be checking off every time JA told a lie in the video.
If she were to take the stand, he would probably look at it the same way. Lie... check. Add them up at the end and discuss with other jurors at the appropriate time. Let's hope this person was correct in her assumptions.