I have a strong feeling that Kimball is probably glad he got out when he did. Then again, that's just my opinion. I also find his use of the term "fray" very very interesting.I guess we've got the answer as to whether or not Ron's former attorney will be representing him on these new charges.
"I don't think we have any plans to get back into the fray," Kimball said.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...ummings-six-months-080909aug09,0,502551.story
I have a strong feeling that Kimball is probably glad he got out when he did. Then again, that's just my opinion. I also find his use of the term "fray" very very interesting.
Strategic wordplay that.
Strategery is good
Also in that article, it states Ronald posted bail of $12,504. And, more ominously, makes note to indicate that one of the detectives now on the case is a homicide detective
I don't like the part I bolded
Since I have no knowledge of bond or bail issues can someone please explain why the whole amount was paid? I thought you only had to pay a portion maybe 10%? TIA
Strategery is good
Also in that article, it states Ronald posted bail of $12,504. And, more ominously, makes note to indicate that one of the detectives now on the case is a homicide detective
I don't like the part I bolded
Do we know or have any reason to believe that this is a recent development?<3 Indiana....but I have to say that I DO like that part. I have long believed that ****** was possibly the crime in question and the sooner we have a qualified investigator of those crimes involved the sooner we may see results in getting the CREEPOID who did it. That in my book is progress. We may find that is the crime they have been looking at all along.
Do we know or have any reason to believe that this is a recent development?
I don't have any idea how large the staff of the PCSO is, but considering the seriousness of the crime of child abduction, and the sad statistics concerning the results I wouldn't be surprised if they have had homicide personnel involved nearly from the onset. In fact I would hope that they have been.
Just asking. Any record of the OCSO personnel assignments to the Haleigh abduction case?
Thanks, . Very concise.The whole amount does have to be paid.
If you have the money you pay it all yourself, after you appear on the charges and the trial is over you get it all back.
If you don't have the money you can pay a bail bondsman a fee - generally 10% - and the bondsman puts up the money to get you out. When you appear on the charges and the trial is over the bail bondsman gets his funds back, but you don't get back the 10%.
In either situation if you don't show up for trial the bail is forfeited and you won't get it back. If you paid the bail bondsman a fee and he has to lose the bail money because you skipped he will come after you for it, along with expenses of tracking you down.
... can't be taken as literal, technical truth. It may be. It may also be just the way the article happened to be phrased.He later posted bail of $12,504 and left the jail.
It settles the question if RC has money though. He had enough to get his own place but has not.....hmmmmm.
They know the perp, it is a matter of getting the evidence/and or the timeline
Concerning the bond, I has suspected that RC paid the bond because I don't see him liking to part with money at all. To have posted the 10% means he would have lost $1250.00...not very Ron like, IMO.
May have had donations and a big check from his trip to NY, child support, big tax refund and unemployment/assistance from State and perhaps SSI for Haleigh......not bad
What settles what question? How?
I thought Ron was staying with his Grandma,
Ooh, goody. Who are "they"? How did you find out that "they" "know". Please share links with the rest of us.
We know that the bond was met. That means we know that the court accepted surety from someone in the matter of the bond. I don't think that we know for certain whom that surety was met by, or in what form it was accepted by the court.
Please share any new info you might have with the rest of us.
I'm not certain, but I think that the 10% option is only an expression of a bondsman providing surety in return for a fee equal to 10% of the amount. Anyone who wanted to could provide what the court required, and not charge Ron a penny. I'm pretty sure that the court doesn't care who it is.
I'm uncertain what point you're trying to make here.
Could you elaborate, please?
It settles the question if RC has money though. He had enough to get his own place but has not.....hmmmmm.