I disagree. According to Misty, their intent was to take her against her will which is to abduct/kidnap. They didn't come with the intention of a friendly casual visit, imo. In-laws or not, it is acceptable to protect your family. I know many in-law cases that have ended with a horrible outcome because they thought not unlike you posted. They couldn't bring themselves to stop the violent attack because it was "family".
I didn't say one word about "waving a gun around". Ronald had a gun and should have showed up with it at the door when they arrived, imo. He knew they were up to no good by being there, imo. He should have been prepared to defend himself and his family.
I disagree. According to Misty, their intent was to take her against her will which is to abduct/kidnap. They didn't come with the intention of a friendly casual visit, imo. In-laws or not, it is acceptable to protect your family. I know many in-law cases that have ended with a horrible outcome because they thought not unlike you posted. They couldn't bring themselves to stop the violent attack because it was "family".
I didn't say one word about "waving a gun around". Ronald had a gun and should have showed up with it at the door when they arrived, imo. He knew they were up to no good by being there, imo. He should have been prepared to defend himself and his family.
But it's going to get sticky trying to prove how you were in fear for your life if the guy was in his car leaving............:waitasec: And you had gone in the house, then came back out...........:waitasec:
Doesn't matter, Misty was still outside and Ron came back out to protect her.
You say that they were told not to come over and they did anyway. I will not ask for a link because I do not have one for my answer, but, IIRC, Misty is the one who SAYS she told them not to come over. Misty does not own that property and has no say over who comes and goes from there. GGM did not say that she told them to leave, but it is in the report that the Croslins were attempting to leave and Ronald attacked HC2 after he got back into the van.
ETA: I should have read the rest of this thread before stopping to post this. BUT, the Croslins were attempting to leave when HC2 was attacked again by Ronald.
Would have to be proven by evidence that her life was at risk.
Would have to be proven by evidence that her life was at risk.
Contact his lawyer? Wow.
Why not? People here were in constant contact with KP
Why not? People here were in constant contact with KP
Six months before RC filed for custody he was convicted and avoided prison for possessing drugs....He was set up for monthly payments to the court as a fine. He was making the payments when he took the children and then was arrested AGAIN!!!
He filed for Custody around Aug/Sept of 05. While he was filing, he incurred the below charges in October 2005:
Character Statute Description Disposition Date Disposition
893.13DRUGS POSSESS-CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE W/O PRESCRIPTION 10/18/2005
893.13(6A) DRUGS POSSESS-CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE W/O PRESCRIPTION 10/18/2005
893.147 NARCOTIC EQUIP POSSESS-AND OR USE 10/18/2005
499.03 DRUGS-POSSESS NEW LEGEND DRUG WO PRESCRIPTION 10/18/2005[/font][/b]
These are serious charges. How was this overlooked by the magistrate during the hearing?
People who have read the paperwork filed know that RC told the court he was concerned about his children being around drugs. There was no evidence Crystal had done any drugs, still the court awarded custody to RC. I need to know why, don't you?
After reading the charges filed against him, you must shake your head in wonder. It has been made perfectly clear on paper that he was asking for the children to be taken away from their mother on the premise he didn't want them around drugs.
RC completely deceived the court and was awarded custody under false pretenses as he was doing/selling drugs before and during his request to save his children from being around drugs....