From the information that’s been released I tend to agree with this theory… only that I think murderous tendencies lay dormant within him all along. MOO.IMO Too much is being made of the age difference. I don't think he saw her face close up and knew she was 50.
He saw a woman running. She was fit.
He saw a woman. She was running. How dare she be out there free and running? Who did he think she was? Did she think she could just go out and do what she wanted?
He'd show her.
If the videos released by the herald sun are actually from the night before he looks to be completely inebriated and uninhibited. Perhaps something as simple as a fight with his girlfriend due to being too far gone or a fight with a friend or someone else mixed with cocktail of drugs that blur the lines of reality, blind rage coincided with unfortunate consequences for SM. I feel like he saw her while out driving wasted or passed her while on her run, noting that she was alone and the area is deserted thought about it for a split second circled back and …
Obviously never met him and this is all speculation but intuitively feel that if not SM then another opportunity that came along mixed with the previous night’s scenario.
perhaps if the police had released the information with a different phrase other then repeating “this was a deliberate attack on Samantha” I would be inclined to think possible hit and run and then cover up. But the police statement combined with the silence and unwillingness to cooperate IMO concludes a worst case scenario?
Maybe someone can clarify interrogation techniques ? I’ve read here that he was questioned for 30 hours ? How is that possible and are there forms of manipulation that occur, within the legal spectrum, a highly publicized case a lot of pressure on LE?