Australia Samantha Murphy, 51, last seen leaving her property to go for a run in the Canadian State Forest, Ballarat, 4 Feb 2024 *Arrest* #12

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

StillDiggin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2020
Messages
3,351
Reaction score
14,096
desperate search continues for a mother-of-three who vanished without a trace after heading off on a 20km run during a heatwave.

Samantha Murphy, 51, was last seen leaving her home on Eureka Street in Ballarat East, about 100km northwest of Melbourne, at 7am on Sunday.

It's understood she was planning to run through the Canadian State Forest and was captured on CCTV wearing a brown singlet and black half-length leggings.

The mother-of-three has now been missing for almost 36 hours

Her 'upset and concerned' family hold grave concerns and described her disappearance as out of character.
1707124823535.jpeg

Thread #1 Thread #2 Thread #3 Thread #4 Thread #5 Thread #6 Thread #7 Thread #8 Thread #9 Thread #10 Thread #11
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IMPORTANT

Effective with the arrest in this case, sub judice is in effect and will be until a trial has concluded. For anyone not familiar with the judicial principle of sub judice, please review the following.

WS is based in the USA but we do try to manage the various discussions to comply with laws of other countries.

As this trial is in Australia, the case is under sub judice so please avoid anything that violates the following principles:

Basically anything that may prejudice the accused’s right to a fair trial
Any suggestion, opinion, or direct accusation that the accused is either guilty OR innocent
(i.e. the accused cannot be called "the killer"; use "the accused", "the alleged killer", or "the defendant")
A defendant’s previous history of any offences is off limits
Scandalizing the court (disparaging judges, lawyers, any officer of the Court) is off limits
Broadcasting anything about proceedings which happen in the jury's absence is off limits
Any non compliance with an Order of the court is off limits

Note in the event of an Appeal subsequent to verdict:
Appeals are usually heard by senior judges who are not likely to be influenced by the media, therefore responsible comment is usually considered acceptable once a trial has concluded, regardless of if there is going to be an appeal.

Posts that are determined to constitute a violation of sub judice will be removed. To avoid this, please review the following from the Victoria Law Reform Commission and post accordingly:
10. Sub judice contempt: restricting the publication of prejudicial information
 
Threads get closed when they get over a certain length, generally 1000+ posts.

It makes it easier for both users and mods. Over that length, it gets very unwieldy.
Thanks. I was curious. I’d mentioned a few things that I’d read on another sleuth site and wondered whether I’d crossed a sub-justice line.
 
Thanks. I was curious. I’d mentioned a few things that I’d read on another sleuth site and wondered whether I’d crossed a sub-justice line.
Have a look at Knitty's links to the rules, especially under this section within her first link, Rules--Etiquette & information.

LINKS and REFERENCING OUTSIDE SOURCES
Websleuths is fact based. Rumors and conspiracy theories are not allowed. Do not link to them and do not mention them.
 
Thanks. I was curious. I’d mentioned a few things that I’d read on another sleuth site and wondered whether I’d crossed a sub-justice line.
Don’t stress Porky, you did nothing wrong. And if you did the Mods would let you know.

Welcome btw - good to have you with us, and hopefully you can shed some new lights to arouse our (my) exhausted & perplexed brains !
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
181
Guests online
1,969
Total visitors
2,150

Forum statistics

Threads
604,114
Messages
18,167,726
Members
231,949
Latest member
Azraelserves
Back
Top