ProfCluezo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2024
- Messages
- 412
- Reaction score
- 3,458
Nailed it Dotta. ![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()
Edit: DBM
Edit: DBM
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sometime too active !!This thread is ALWAYS active!!
Yeah, you have to consider the source. Anything to suck you in.Very misleading headline in the Daily Mail.
Most people would think that it was Samantha's daughter. I know I did
Samantha Murphy: Ballarat rocked by death of 23-year-old woman after mother disappeared
![]()
Grim update in search for Samantha Murphy's body
The locals of Ballarat, northwest of Melbourne , had already been struggling to come to terms with the alleged murder of Samantha Murphy, 51, and have now been dealt another blow.www.dailymail.co.uk
Edited to say that it looks like they changed what the initial link said but they have kept it in the article
"Samantha Murphy: Ballarat rocked by death of 23-year-old woman after mother disappeared"
RIP to the poor person![]()
The Coroner could not deter mine cause of death for Allison due to decomposition.They did believe haemorrhage, smothering or strangulation, blunt force was the cause
But the judge was undetermined
His defence team, which successfully suppressed parts of the autopsy report at the trial.
It was the scratches on his face which were to prove crucial in his sentencing
Forensic medicine nowadays is outstanding, so much new technology
The best scenario is
If he confesses and gives up the body then it's all over.
Wow, seriously…? Out potentially by 40….?The Coroner could not deter mine cause of death for Allison due to decomposition.
I do hope Samantha is found soon and as you say new technology might be able to detect lots of forensics.
The best thing for everyone would be for accused to confess (if he actually did it), say where her body is, give family closure and suck up his sentence. He could be out by the time he is 40.
And that is an incredibly frightening thought/reality.He could be out by the time he is 40.
May I ask what, practically, would have to occur for the alleged accused to be out of jail by 40? That would be only 18 years in prison….And that is an incredibly frightening thought/reality.
Actually, the minimum jail time for murder is 25 years, so he'd be 47 not 40, if found guilty and doing the minimum time. I'm not sure if you potentially get time off for good behaviour with murder, but potentially he could be released earlier if that's the case. Manslaughter has a minimum jail time of 15 years, making him 37 on release if that was the case. I'm not the right person to ask, there are many others here with a much better understanding of Australian laws. Hopefully they'll have some insight for us both.May I ask what, practically, would have to occur for the alleged accused to be out of jail by 40? That would be only 18 years in prison….
Would this be if alleged murder charges could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt? And hence downgraded to alleged manslaughter? What kinds of circumstances might impact granting of bail?
The Coroner could not determine the exact cause of death. Strangulation was suspected. The autopsy report was partially withheld at the trial - agreed by prosecution and defence - as it was deemed not to shed any further light on the case. Believe me, I have read it and it would make any grown person vomit!How is that even possible? On what grounds? That seems ridiculous to me. (Not that I'm questioning you, just the process)
Ok. Life is 25 years in Victoria. His current time in jail will be taken off the sentence, then he could get released early on parole is he behaves himself. But if he never discloses where SM is and she is not found, he will do the full time - no body, no parole.May I ask what, practically, would have to occur for the alleged accused to be out of jail by 40? That would be only 18 years in prison….
Would this be if alleged murder charges could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt? And hence downgraded to alleged manslaughter? What kinds of circumstances might impact granting of bail?
Thanks for the clarification. If her cause of death couldn't be proven then I guess it's not relevant, and "hearsay " maybe. I thought the defence was able to quash it for some reason which didn't sound right.The Coroner could not determine the exact cause of death. Strangulation was suspected. The autopsy report was partially withheld at the trial - agreed by prosecution and defence - as it was deemed not to shed any further light on the case. Believe me, I have read it and it would make any grown person vomit!
Does the no body-no parole exist in Victoria? The answer seems to be unclear.Ok. Life is 25 years in Victoria. His current time in jail will be taken off the sentence, then he could get released early on parole is he behaves himself. But if he never discloses where SM is and she is not found, he will do the full time - no body, no parole.
Yes. This was discussed a few weeks back. There was talk of part of the law being changed, but all deleted - off topicDoes the no body-no parole exist in Victoria? The answer seems to be unclear.