Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like the sound of that, in as much as it sounds like it might be based on someone or something that has helped narrow the search area."Intelligence derived from a number of sources"
Maybe others know what happened to SM
Possible someone else or others may have some involvement
Do you think if they are searching in the correct spot he may talk? To avoid the no body no parole at the last minute, and with no body no parole what if police find her on there own information does that still apply?
If he didn't do it, surely he'd be denying it to anyone who'll listen, and applying for bail and generally doing whatever he could to be believed. Or is that just me?If he did it, I'm sure he's hoping that there is not enough proof.
If he didn't do it and really doesn't know where the body is, well of course he wouldn't be able to tell them where she is.
The police do seem to be certain that they have the right person.
Sun sets around 8.20pm in February in VictoriaIf 5 pm ping is correct,
it might mean the accused was allegedly transporting the victim late afternoon.
When the dusk was approaching.
JMO
Praying this search is successful and she can be brought home to her family for burial. It seems they have a specific area so I hope that is a good sign that she's there based on a digital trail, cameras, etc.
We don't know that he's not doing this.If he didn't do it, surely he'd be denying it to anyone who'll listen, and applying for bail and generally doing whatever he could to be believed. Or is that just me?
MOO
Except with day light savings in the middle of summer, dusk would not have been for many hours.If 5 pm ping is correct,
it might mean the accused was allegedly transporting the victim late afternoon.
When the dusk was approaching.
JMO
Apparently he hasn't cooperated from the get go. So even if he talks now about where SM is, and he is found guilty, the judge can make a ruling that if parole is requested, the fact that he didn't initially co-operate be taken into consideration at that time. This has been discussed previously.Do you think if they are searching in the correct spot he may talk? To avoid the no body no parole at the last minute, and with no body no parole what if police find her on there own information does that still apply?
True, but it seems every MSM outlet is reporting he's not cooperating and has given a "no comment" to police questioning. To me, that doesn't sound like an innocent person's actions. MOOWe don't know that he's not doing this.
That's interesting, and clears up the question of cadaver dogs being used in the past if true. (Link in the quoted post. It says this is the first time they've been used in the search for Samantha.) Hopefully they can use the dogs for as long as needed without being rushed and that they have success.I think the specific area may be in the North East section of Enfield State Park. Closer to Ballarat.
In a way, this park seems a more likely place where PS may have dumped Sam. Outside his area, but not too far away. So he wouldn't be missed by being gone for too long.
This HS article has a photo of today's police staging area, which is in Napolean's Recreation Reserve (outside the NE section of the Enfield State Park).
'Doing everything we can': Police in new search for Samantha Murphy
The Enfield State Park is the massive forest to the left of and below the staging area.
View attachment 496391
Google Maps
Innocent until found guilty. He has a right to remain silent and we should not be judging him for exercising his rights.True, but it seems every MSM outlet is reporting he's not cooperating and has given a "no comment" to police questioning. To me, that doesn't sound like an innocent person's actions. MOO
BBM--I don't remember seeing a link though. It might have been wishful thinking.Apparently he hasn't cooperated from the get go. So even if he talks now about where SM is, and he is found guilty, the judge can make a ruling that if parole is requested, the fact that he didn't initially co-operate be taken into consideration at that time. This has been discussed previously.
Hopefully this means that they may have a pretty good idea that this is the area Sam may be in??That's interesting, and clears up the question of cadaver dogs being used in the past if true. (Link in the quoted post. It says this is the first time they've been used in the search for Samantha.) Hopefully they can use the dogs for as long as needed without being rushed and that they have success.