TE said the last time the phone was used was at 3:41. He said it was turned off after that and he went on to say that was unlike Heather to turn off her phone. That's what makes it confusing.
If that remark about usage is not correct (for whatever reason), and there was still phone usage until 6:00, as per two reports now, it still wouldn't matter what kind of communication was used. The record would show the time and duration of any activity.
My question is who was using the phone all that time after Heather's last contact with her roommate? We don't know.
There's no information on pings that we can discuss here. But it would be interesting to know for certain where the phones in question were during all the activity that's said to have gone on until 6:00.
It's a problem for a person if the claim is he wanted no more calls, then his phone was part of a "back and forth" for a period of time, but it's a bigger problem if his phone was not a reasonable distance from Heather's phone, or not at a location that makes sense, while all this was going on.
I've always felt the phone records, both activity log and pings, tell a good deal of this story.
The other thing is, according to the media article on the police report, OM stated he had called Heather "the night before", as in the 17th, to tell her to stop calling. How does that work if his phone was involved in the later exchanges that flowed into the 18th?
Again, where were the two phones according to ping records for this period of time?
That's what I'd like to know.
How are PMs conducted? Via what method?
We have PMs on WS meaning private message. But it's unlikely they're referring to HE's PMs on WS!
Since HE's social media stopped just past 2AM, is there a way she could have been sending PMs up until 6AM?
What gadgets include PMs that aren't considered social media?
Email is email not PMs, right?
PMs aren't texts, right? Texts are texts.
So, did PMs stop shortly past 2AM too?
If so, does that only leave the possibility of her phone which would be voice or text.? (She could do internet stuff on her phone though too, right?)
PMs aren't tweets. PMs aren't tumblr. PMs aren't FB. PMs aren't emails. Where do PMs come into play for HE?
Reminding, we know nothing about Pings from LE.
Also, I continue to be confused more than I would anyway because of the reporting - they take too much liberty when interpreting what's been said by officials.
Even LE and Rhodes gave different messages. Rhodes said "fairly comfortable" and LE said "Everything" points to - about HE driving herself to PTL. Then the reporter used "Strongly".
The info given today was for the purpose of pacifying the public, nothing more imo.
Also the reporting should have been clean - not mixing the old in with the new as they did.
They should have kept what was reported to what was said today imo.
This really is the weakest press/police communications I've encountered even when they do speak out. Terrible. Rhodes couldn't stand in front of a TV camera and let everybody hear her answers? Really bad and other than the PMs mentioned, nothing has been clarified at all. Sex trafficking is off the table but that's the only progress that's been made (as far as the public is concerned).
fftobed:
**Edited to provide this link for their Investor Relations Site - 