Seattle1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 42,277
- Reaction score
- 438,348
Come on @Warwick7 -- we're talking slick lawyers AM and DH!!True.
But handling his own weapon, that had to have been fired. (Which he does not say he did).
<modsnip - no link>
What's to stop AM from alleging he did indeed fire a weapon earlier in the day -- perhaps when he was riding around the property with PM!
We can't forget the spent casings already present on the ground before the murders.
And AM & DH would know there's no scientific test to determine whether a particular gun has recently been fired:
There is no scientific test currently available to determine whether a particular gun has been recently fired – the available testing only determines whether there is residue from a recent firing on the person’s skin, clothes, etc. It is also important to note that the absence of GSR does not prove that a person did not fire a gun, since the residual chemicals can be removed by wiping, hand-washing, wind, rain, etc. See State v. Lambert, 341 N.C. 36 (1995) (“negative gunshot residue test could be explained by defendant's wringing of her hands and the use of her hands to wipe tears from her face”).
Last edited by a moderator: