At this point I din't think it really matters, Fenandez's last question to this guy was if you were standing at the kennels would you have heard the guns being fired.
That’s all he really needed to ask him IMO
I can hear gunshots while on trails and worry that one may get me. lol
And that is why Fernandez' last question was perfect: "If you were at the kennels could you hear the shots?"
As soon as Buster said that they routinely parked on the lawn near the back door at Almeda property, we know he is saying whatever the defence wants him to say. Everyone knows what a lawn looks like when it's used as a parking lot. Furthermore, I doubt Randolph Murdaugh would have allowed anyone to do that. What he said and what we see don't line up.
Perfect question to end with.
Stay frosty out there girl, enjoy the trail keep your eyes peeled and stay safe.
And the icing on the cake is that the judge overruled the objection.
I think the point was well made that his expertise was not firearms nor ballistics involving shots fired through victim's bodies. The man should not have been testifying about this case, other cases involving cars, trucks, boats or ships, yes but not this case. AJMO
I know! He must have been thoroughly disenchanted with the 5'2" assassin stuff as much as I was.And the icing on the cake is that the judge overruled the objection.
Leading the witness
But they don’t kill the pet quail or trainer quail. Or at least simply mouth a dead trainer quail softly. Then the ol’ boys go out to shoot the “wild“ quail. Then the dogs go back into the kennels again. The dogs have learned to have a soft mouth. They don’t get to eat anything except some dog food. The good ol’ boys eat the quail, presumably, or give them to a homeless shelter With their chef preparing a delicious treat for those that haven’t a roof over th head. I would carefully check those dogs for GSR.
