Jedothek
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2022
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 2
I present a scenario for JonBenet’s death that fits the facts that I know. I would welcome others pointing to facts that do not fit.
An employee of Access Graphics, the company of which John Ramsey was president, hated him. Call this employee P. I would look for him among the people who worked directly under JR. P had experienced JR as a tyrant. (It is irrelevant whether other employees experienced JR as a tyrant. This is matter of personal feeling.) P learns through some channel (such information would be available on the company computer system if one had a little hacking ability) that this hated boss had “undeservedly” received a bonus of $118,117.50. P hatches a vile scheme to hold JonBenet for ransom.
In contemplating the scheme, he decides it’s a two-man job: imagine going through windows, opening doors, driving a car etc., all while keeping control of a child. He therefore solicits the aid of the sketchiest person he knows, perhaps someone with a prison history: because note, if he asks a decent person, that person will say no and tell either JR or the authorities. Call this accomplice Q.
The two go to the Ramsey home, enter, grab JonBenet and tie her up, and then – stay with me – P discovers that he has forgotten to bring the ransom note. Now, this may sound comical, but it is not implausible. How many times have you gone somewhere to do a task and then discovered you have failed to bring something essential? Note that we are not talking about a master criminal. P is a punk who’s never committed a felony before; just a young man driven by hate. He left the note at home.
So he tells Q to keep hold of JonBenet while P goes to another part of the house and finds pen and paper, writes the note asking for an amount he knows that JR has in his account, adding all the ridiculous Hollywood stuff about “a small foreign faction” and so forth that does not fool any of us.
He then returns to the basement. While he has been gone, Q has proven to be even more evil than P suspected: Q has molested and killed JonBenet, with the second act perhaps not being exactly deliberate: he could have used the garrote for some erotic reason, accidently twisted it too tight etc.
P has already laid the ransom note on the stairs. He realizes that the project (in addition to being evil) is a total disaster. The two leave.
Some may find this far-fetched. I do not. But I am not asking whether it is far-fetched. I am asking whether any facts in the case contradict it.
Thoughts?
J
An employee of Access Graphics, the company of which John Ramsey was president, hated him. Call this employee P. I would look for him among the people who worked directly under JR. P had experienced JR as a tyrant. (It is irrelevant whether other employees experienced JR as a tyrant. This is matter of personal feeling.) P learns through some channel (such information would be available on the company computer system if one had a little hacking ability) that this hated boss had “undeservedly” received a bonus of $118,117.50. P hatches a vile scheme to hold JonBenet for ransom.
In contemplating the scheme, he decides it’s a two-man job: imagine going through windows, opening doors, driving a car etc., all while keeping control of a child. He therefore solicits the aid of the sketchiest person he knows, perhaps someone with a prison history: because note, if he asks a decent person, that person will say no and tell either JR or the authorities. Call this accomplice Q.
The two go to the Ramsey home, enter, grab JonBenet and tie her up, and then – stay with me – P discovers that he has forgotten to bring the ransom note. Now, this may sound comical, but it is not implausible. How many times have you gone somewhere to do a task and then discovered you have failed to bring something essential? Note that we are not talking about a master criminal. P is a punk who’s never committed a felony before; just a young man driven by hate. He left the note at home.
So he tells Q to keep hold of JonBenet while P goes to another part of the house and finds pen and paper, writes the note asking for an amount he knows that JR has in his account, adding all the ridiculous Hollywood stuff about “a small foreign faction” and so forth that does not fool any of us.
He then returns to the basement. While he has been gone, Q has proven to be even more evil than P suspected: Q has molested and killed JonBenet, with the second act perhaps not being exactly deliberate: he could have used the garrote for some erotic reason, accidently twisted it too tight etc.
P has already laid the ransom note on the stairs. He realizes that the project (in addition to being evil) is a total disaster. The two leave.
Some may find this far-fetched. I do not. But I am not asking whether it is far-fetched. I am asking whether any facts in the case contradict it.
Thoughts?
J
