Medical review of Jonbenet case

PossumPie

New Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2024
Messages
1
Reaction score
23
I don't know who killed JonBenet. I am a medical professional so I'll give professional input on facts.
1. A stun gun does NOT cause immediate unconsciousness...I've been struck with a stun gun as a medical experiment-- I SCREAMED. It causes cellular disruption via chemical reactions. It will knock you off of your feet, BUT it is painful and you will scream. it does NOT cause paralysis or unconsciousness.
2. The TINY amount of DNA in the underwear is consistent with a sneeze/cough/loud speech of someone...including someone manufacturing it. NOT sexual assault. Sexual assault leads to millions of cells deposited--not tens of cells.
3. Much debate has been made as to who murdered her. (Mom/Dad/Burke/Stranger. This is not complete...A stranger could have killed her, BUT Mom and Dad could have quickly thought Burke did it...Once believing that their son was NOT involved, their cover-up via fake note and made-up facts could have been not needed.
4. Pediatricians do NOT commonly do vaginal exams on pre-pubescent girls. IF she had chronic vaginitis (inflammation) then sexual assault or chronic bed-wetting would be suspected. Any pediatrician who delt with a female with chronic vaginitis who denied that sexual abuse would be possible, would be covering up. One must ALWAYS have sexual abuse as a possible cause of chronic vaginitis...
5. Many "suspicious" things that Burke said are consistent with a 9-year-old child. He can not be expected to have given precise times, or events. Burke may have played a part in the incident, but his contradictions, actions, and affect after the murder cannot be used as evidence of guilt. It MAY be that parents THOUGHT that he was guilty...
6. The ransom note attempts to make John look like a good guy, and has many commands such as "rest" that point to someone who loves John. No matter who killed her, the note was written by someone who loved John Ramsey.
7. Spiderwebs DON'T lie...There was evidence that nobody entered or exited the "broken window" due to an intact spiderweb in the frame. No human could enter/exit that window without breaking the web. Also, there were months worth of pine needles on top of the metal grate...it wasn't opened before the murder.
8. 30 years later, John is still actively pushing to find the killer...he believes that a non-family member killed his daughter. This doesn't mean that he didn't initially think it was Patsy/Burke, but it means that quickly he realized that it probably wasn't. There were secretes in the family...Burke most of all...but in the end, John realized that he blamed his son without probable cause...

<ADMIN NOTE: Above is all member opinion in lieu of them being WS Verified >
 
Last edited by a moderator:
6. The ransom note attempts to make John look like a good guy, and has many commands such as "rest" that point to someone who loves John. No matter who killed her, the note was written by someone who loved John Ramsey.
RSBM: Having just re-read that note in the last day - this is a very strong and good point.

The letter really does seem very personal to JR and cryptic. Almost like JR would put the clues together and know who it was in a warped way, almost a way to get his attention as if the murder was't enough.

At least to me, it seems like a riddle in a way, taunting JR with jabs of details with perversity.
 
'8. 30 years later, John is still actively pushing to find the killer...he believes that a non-family member killed his daughter. This doesn't mean that he didn't initially think it was Patsy/Burke, but it means that quickly he realized that it probably wasn't. There were secretes in the family...Burke most of all...but in the end, John realized that he blamed his son without probable cause...

How does John realize he blamed his son..?
 
Also, I don’t think the ransom note “attempts to make John look like a good guy”, nor reflects love, affection, admiration, or any positive feelings about him. I think it evinces disdain toward him. And I think that person who holds JR in disdain, and who wrote the “War and Peace of ransom notes”, is none other than PR.

MOO.
 
I obviously don’t know who did it but I do know that whoever did wrapped her in a blanket before leaving her and I’ve done enough research to know that that is not the act of a stranger. Typically that’s the act of someone close to the victim
 
And it was the exact amount of John's bonus.
The funny thing is, it wasn’t exactly $118,000, it was a bit more than that, like an amount after tax, with dollars and cents. If the so-called ransom demand was based off the amount of JR’s bonus, why be a little bit exact? Why round a little but not a normal amount? Eg. Round down to $100,000 or up to $120,000, or $125,000. Just one of the many odd things about the RN.
 
Moo I will be so happy when it’s finally solved and it turns out to be an intruder and not the family. Rest in peace sweet soul JonBenet. I feel 2025 is your year for justice. I’m pray it is.
 
Moo I will be so happy when it’s finally solved and it turns out to be an intruder and not the family. Rest in peace sweet soul JonBenet. I feel 2025 is your year for justice. I’m pray it is.
I’ll be happy if and when it’s solved whether IDI or a RDI, because so far, justice has not been served. That to me is really more important than if it was J, P, R, friend, acquaintance, or stranger. IMO
 
Moo I will be so happy when it’s finally solved and it turns out to be an intruder and not the family. Rest in peace sweet soul JonBenet. I feel 2025 is your year for justice. I’m pray it is.
How did an intruder break in and not leave any footprints in the snow or not disturb the spiderweb on the window?
 
Yet RDI is far more likely. Someone in that house had means, motive, and opportunity to kill her. Sometimes when it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a duck.
There's DNA from someone who wasn't a Ramsey found on JonBenet - from two different sources, on two different garments of different age and origin. No one has ever given a credible explanation for this. And until someone does, an intruder remains to he most likely.
 
After pondering upon my point of the decimal in the first reference of the ransom amount, I was doing some brainstorming that led me to the conclusion that the author of the note must HAVE SEEN the check in person. This is why I believe it has decimals; it was a brain reference to the amount in the little box on the far right of the check!
 

Keep Websleuths Free

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
150
Guests online
3,191
Total visitors
3,341

Forum statistics

Threads
619,211
Messages
18,394,962
Members
238,369
Latest member
Grace503
Back
Top