I don't know who killed JonBenet. I am a medical professional so I'll give professional input on facts.
1. A stun gun does NOT cause immediate unconsciousness...I've been struck with a stun gun as a medical experiment-- I SCREAMED. It causes cellular disruption via chemical reactions. It will knock you off of your feet, BUT it is painful and you will scream. it does NOT cause paralysis or unconsciousness.
2. The TINY amount of DNA in the underwear is consistent with a sneeze/cough/loud speech of someone...including someone manufacturing it. NOT sexual assault. Sexual assault leads to millions of cells deposited--not tens of cells.
3. Much debate has been made as to who murdered her. (Mom/Dad/Burke/Stranger. This is not complete...A stranger could have killed her, BUT Mom and Dad could have quickly thought Burke did it...Once believing that their son was NOT involved, their cover-up via fake note and made-up facts could have been not needed.
4. Pediatricians do NOT commonly do vaginal exams on pre-pubescent girls. IF she had chronic vaginitis (inflammation) then sexual assault or chronic bed-wetting would be suspected. Any pediatrician who delt with a female with chronic vaginitis who denied that sexual abuse would be possible, would be covering up. One must ALWAYS have sexual abuse as a possible cause of chronic vaginitis...
5. Many "suspicious" things that Burke said are consistent with a 9-year-old child. He can not be expected to have given precise times, or events. Burke may have played a part in the incident, but his contradictions, actions, and affect after the murder cannot be used as evidence of guilt. It MAY be that parents THOUGHT that he was guilty...
6. The ransom note attempts to make John look like a good guy, and has many commands such as "rest" that point to someone who loves John. No matter who killed her, the note was written by someone who loved John Ramsey.
7. Spiderwebs DON'T lie...There was evidence that nobody entered or exited the "broken window" due to an intact spiderweb in the frame. No human could enter/exit that window without breaking the web. Also, there were months worth of pine needles on top of the metal grate...it wasn't opened before the murder.
8. 30 years later, John is still actively pushing to find the killer...he believes that a non-family member killed his daughter. This doesn't mean that he didn't initially think it was Patsy/Burke, but it means that quickly he realized that it probably wasn't. There were secretes in the family...Burke most of all...but in the end, John realized that he blamed his son without probable cause...
<ADMIN NOTE: Above is all member opinion in lieu of them being WS Verified >
1. A stun gun does NOT cause immediate unconsciousness...I've been struck with a stun gun as a medical experiment-- I SCREAMED. It causes cellular disruption via chemical reactions. It will knock you off of your feet, BUT it is painful and you will scream. it does NOT cause paralysis or unconsciousness.
2. The TINY amount of DNA in the underwear is consistent with a sneeze/cough/loud speech of someone...including someone manufacturing it. NOT sexual assault. Sexual assault leads to millions of cells deposited--not tens of cells.
3. Much debate has been made as to who murdered her. (Mom/Dad/Burke/Stranger. This is not complete...A stranger could have killed her, BUT Mom and Dad could have quickly thought Burke did it...Once believing that their son was NOT involved, their cover-up via fake note and made-up facts could have been not needed.
4. Pediatricians do NOT commonly do vaginal exams on pre-pubescent girls. IF she had chronic vaginitis (inflammation) then sexual assault or chronic bed-wetting would be suspected. Any pediatrician who delt with a female with chronic vaginitis who denied that sexual abuse would be possible, would be covering up. One must ALWAYS have sexual abuse as a possible cause of chronic vaginitis...
5. Many "suspicious" things that Burke said are consistent with a 9-year-old child. He can not be expected to have given precise times, or events. Burke may have played a part in the incident, but his contradictions, actions, and affect after the murder cannot be used as evidence of guilt. It MAY be that parents THOUGHT that he was guilty...
6. The ransom note attempts to make John look like a good guy, and has many commands such as "rest" that point to someone who loves John. No matter who killed her, the note was written by someone who loved John Ramsey.
7. Spiderwebs DON'T lie...There was evidence that nobody entered or exited the "broken window" due to an intact spiderweb in the frame. No human could enter/exit that window without breaking the web. Also, there were months worth of pine needles on top of the metal grate...it wasn't opened before the murder.
8. 30 years later, John is still actively pushing to find the killer...he believes that a non-family member killed his daughter. This doesn't mean that he didn't initially think it was Patsy/Burke, but it means that quickly he realized that it probably wasn't. There were secretes in the family...Burke most of all...but in the end, John realized that he blamed his son without probable cause...
<ADMIN NOTE: Above is all member opinion in lieu of them being WS Verified >
Last edited by a moderator: