It can't be the '1000 places...' book because of the picture below posted by Tex. Maybe it's his bible.
There was a Bible found on the front seat of his car. Though he may well have had more than one...
It can't be the '1000 places...' book because of the picture below posted by Tex. Maybe it's his bible.
IN HER OWN WORDS
November, 2007.
Im determined to do a full 10% tithe of all my earnings. I think Ill start putting 10% of my tips and paychecks in a separate container. That should help, and its such a small percentage I wont miss it.
It makes me feel good to know Ill be helping build Heavenly Fathers kingdom. The tax write off helps of course, but Id do it even if there was not one single tax dollar advantage.
It can't be the '1000 places...' book because of the picture below posted by Tex. Maybe it's his bible.
She's a SparkNotes kind of student. She showed no interest in anything that wasn't about her, or connected to her, or couldn't be used for her benefit. I truly doubt she ever read a book to learn anything beyond her narrow scope or read something simply for the pleasure of reading.
I doubt it too. The only books she mentions at all are those TA had expressed an interest in or had read.
IIRC, in early March 2008 she listed reading 10-15 books in the next 9 months year as one of her ambitious goals, lol. I read that many every other week.
Re: JA's pants in the foot photo
Aren't stripes usually on the side of pants? I have not yet seen a pair of pants with stripes on the back. I see two stripes. Thosee stripes go all the way up to the butt area or stop in the middle somewhere?
Gigi, I made you some asparagus
View attachment 91152
BBM. Yeah, it's not like you're going to be getting a cleaning deposit back on it like an apartment you rented...
I agree with that, pocket. I've also never seen zippers on the inside seem or on the back of pants, which is why I think it's her left foot in the picture. The zipper looks in the correct place for it to be on a left pant leg. As for the black thing beneath Travis, I have no idea what it is. Maybe it's a black house shoe for a right foot and she lost the shoe while backing up and tousling with Travis. As she backed up, the right foot bumped the camera, taking the pic of the left leg, the back of whose foothill is standing on the house shoe (or whatever that black thing is). But it's apparent that there's no foot in that black thing because you can see Travis' skin and blood between the black thing and the pant leg.
There is always the chance that it's her right and her pants and turned sideways so much that it just appears that the zipper is out of place. I mean, it is a fight going on. But because "something" had to make the camera move and take the picture, I'm thinking it's her right foot, possibly behind the camera or beside it -- out of frame.
My theory is she shoved the camera into her right pocket when she started stabbing him with her left hand. While moving his body IMO the camera fell out, landed upside down and snapped the pic of her right foot Jmo
My theory is she shoved the camera into her right pocket when she started stabbing him with her left hand. While moving his body IMO the camera fell out, landed upside down and snapped the pic of her right foot Jmo
I agree with that, pocket. I've also never seen zippers on the inside seem or on the back of pants, which is why I think it's her left foot in the picture. The zipper looks in the correct place for it to be on a left pant leg. As for the black thing beneath Travis, I have no idea what it is. Maybe it's a black house shoe for a right foot and she lost the shoe while backing up and tousling with Travis. As she backed up, the right foot bumped the camera, taking the pic of the left leg, the back of whose foothill is standing on the house shoe (or whatever that black thing is). But it's apparent that there's no foot in that black thing because you can see Travis' skin and blood between the black thing and the pant leg.
There is always the chance that it's her right and her pants and turned sideways so much that it just appears that the zipper is out of place. I mean, it is a fight going on. But because "something" had to make the camera move and take the picture, I'm thinking it's her right foot, possibly behind the camera or beside it -- out of frame.
BBM
I have a pair of Nike running pants that have 6 inch zippers on the back of both legs. Because of that, I've always thought that photo was of her right leg.
It's her right leg. Zippers on sweat pants can be on the side or in the back or even in the front on some brands. But I have never seen a stripe on an inside seam.
I agree with that, pocket. I've also never seen zippers on the inside seem or on the back of pants, which is why I think it's her left foot in the picture. The zipper looks in the correct place for it to be on a left pant leg. As for the black thing beneath Travis, I have no idea what it is. Maybe it's a black house shoe for a right foot and she lost the shoe while backing up and tousling with Travis. As she backed up, the right foot bumped the camera, taking the pic of the left leg, the back of whose foothill is standing on the house shoe (or whatever that black thing is). But it's apparent that there's no foot in that black thing because you can see Travis' skin and blood between the black thing and the pant leg.
There is always the chance that it's her right and her pants and turned sideways so much that it just appears that the zipper is out of place. I mean, it is a fight going on. But because "something" had to make the camera move and take the picture, I'm thinking it's her right foot, possibly behind the camera or beside it -- out of frame.
I've read about her putting his camera in the pocket of her sweat pants a few times now. Was Travis' Sony/Sanyo a small "table top" point-and-shoot camera or was it the size of a 35mm film camera? Because if his camera was the latter, would a camera that size be able to fit into the pocket of a pair of sweat pants? That seems to be somewhat of a... wait for it... stretch. Get it? S-t-r-e-t-c-h.
But just so I understand what picture we're talking about here... this is the pic in the hallway showing her foot, leg, and poor Travis' head, shoulder and arm?
Because if so, then if the camera fell on the tile floor and accidentally took the picture, then the picture we've been looking at is actually whirled 180º, right? Like, to look at the picture the way it was actually taken (accidentally), we should be looking at it (the pic) upside down, right?
This is what the butcheress drove.....*2004 Infinity G-35, Silver in color*