Question about latest Juan Martinez accusations: Could somebody please :tantrum: tell me what is going on? What is with the "social media blogger" etc?
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2018/02/13/arizona-state-bar-complaint-jodi-arias-prosecutor-juan-martinez/332195002/
Kaddy- a less knee jerk reply about what's going on.
Don't know how closely you followed the trial and/or the retrial, so sorry if I'm telling you what you already know.
The penalty retrial wasn't televised. It was tweeted. One of those who tweeted the retrial was a gal named Tammy Rose. She was an unknown during the first trial, and hadn't developed sources of her own,or, judging by her trial tweets, much trial knowledge of any kind. She was and is basically a local traffic "reporter," flying about in helicopters.
Tammy wanted more of an "in" on the retrial, so she ingratiated herself with that "trial blogger" the Kieffer-twit mentions. Way after the retrial and the kerfluffle of juror #17's identity being leaked, and after Tammy's trial tweeting hadn't increased her SM following, Tammy Rose decided to insert herself again, this time by approaching the Bar with "evidence" that the trial blogger she had used during the retrial had been involved with JM, and with accusations that JM had been involved in leaking juror 17's name.
You can perhaps judge her intentions in doing so by noting that she immediately rushed to SM to blog about how she had been caught up in the drama, that she felt so bad about calling the blogger a tramp and a liar, and JM an unethical liar, but that she could no longer keep quiet about the explosive evidence she had about the wrong that was done to #17, and yes, to the . The trial might have turned out differently, Tammy tweeted, over and over, if only what she knew was known back then !!!!
Putting aside the circus & drama queen...
To think Clark's charges against JM have any merit whatsoever, this is what one would have to believe:
1. That after the years & everything else he put into convicting the , JM was willing to risk giving the a basis for appeal.
2. That JM was so desperate to secure a DP verdict during the penalty retrial that he manipulated a trial watcher and a trial blogger into having sex with him so that he could use them.
3. That JM used sex to have both women do his will. This included revealing #17's name DURING the retrial to one or both women so that dirt could be dug up on the juror.
4. That immediately following the PP2 mistrial, JM had the blogger release #17's name and Facebook page to the media.
5. That JM lied in the formal investigations that followed about how and by whom 17's name was leaked.
6. That the findings of the intensive juror17 leak investigations were completely wrong (they don't mention JM at all, much less accuse him).
And last, that the AZ Bar's clearing of JM after their year long investigation into these charges was not only wrong , but an abuse of their discretion.
That's a whole lot of hooey to have to swallow, imo.
